Skip to content

CCI Cost of Production Regulations 2025 on Predatory Pricing

21 June 20251 min read
ECONOMYCCI Cost ofProductionRegulations 2025 onPredatory Pricing21 June 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

CCI introduced cost benchmarks to judge predatory pricing, aiming at stronger competition safeguards in digital and capital-intensive markets.

Key facts

  • Regulation: Determination of Cost of Production Regulations, 2025 by the Competition Commission of India.
  • Benchmark: Average Total Cost (ATC).
  • Illustration cited: NSE vs MCX, where zero pricing in currency derivatives drew exclusion allegations.

Predatory pricing

A dominant firm deliberately prices below cost to remove competitors and gain monopoly power; consumers gain briefly but face harm later, with less choice and innovation.

TypeMeaning
Direct predationPrices kept below cost
Cross-subsidisationProfits from one segment fund undercutting in another
Discriminatory pricingCheap rates for targeted segments

Why it occurs

  • Dominant firms with deep reserves.
  • Network externalities in digital markets.
  • Weak enforcement: only one case upheld before 2025.
  • No clear cost metric earlier; cross-border e-commerce gaps.

Regulatory challenges

  • Proving intent under Section 4.
  • Chilling effect on AI and FinTech startups.
  • Fragmented market surveillance and judicial delays.

Exam angle

  • Cost benchmark: ATC; section on abuse of dominance: Section 4, Competition Act.

Test yourself

1. CCI's 2025 cost regulations use which benchmark to assess predatory pricing?

The notes say the rules rely on Average Total Cost (ATC).

2. Under which section of the Competition Act is predatory intent difficult to establish, per the notes?

Proving predatory motive is hard under Section 4.

3. Using profits from one business to undercut rivals in another is called what?

That is cross-subsidisation.