Skip to content

Supreme Court Reaffirms Safeguards Against Section 498A Misuse

18 September 20251 min read
NATIONAL AFFAIRSSupreme CourtReaffirmsSafeguards AgainstSection 498A Misuse18 September 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

On 18 September 2025 the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed measures meant to prevent the misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, in the case Shivangi Bansal vs Sahib Bansal.

Key facts

  • The Court reaffirmed earlier guidelines laid down by the Allahabad High Court.
  • A two-month cooling period applies before any coercive action in matrimonial disputes.
  • Complaints are referred to a Family Welfare Committee (FWC).
  • Courts have noted increasing misuse of the provision to file false complaints.
NCRB measure20152022
Section 498A offences113,403140,019
Arrests187,067145,095

About Section 498A

Section 498A of the IPC deals with cruelty against women by husbands or their families, and aims to protect women from matrimonial harassment. Earlier safeguards include the Lalita Kumari ruling on preliminary inquiry, the Arnesh Kumar judgment (2014) and Satender Kumar Antil (2022) on bail.

Exam angle

  • Remember the case name, the two-month cooling period and the FWC.
  • Arnesh Kumar (2014) is a frequently cited precedent on arrests.
  • Section 498A concerns cruelty by husband or relatives.

Test yourself

1. Section 498A of the IPC deals with which subject?

It addresses cruelty against women by husbands or their families.

2. What cooling period before coercive action was reaffirmed?

The guidelines provide a two-month cooling period.

3. Complaints under the reaffirmed guidelines are referred to which body?

They are referred to a Family Welfare Committee.

Sources: GKToday, GKToday daily archive 18 Sep