Skip to content

SEBI Conflict of Interest Framework: Sinha Committee Decisions

31 March 20262 min read
BANKING & FINANCESEBI Conflict ofInterest Framework:Sinha CommitteeDecisions31 March 2026safalsetu.com

Why in the news

SEBI constituted a high-level committee to review how conflicts of interest and disclosures are handled, after Hindenburg Research alleged that the previous chairperson’s conflicts could interfere with a fair probe into certain listed entities. The board has now decided on the committee’s proposals.

Key facts

  • Committee head: Pratyush Sinha, former Central Vigilance Commissioner.
  • Report date: November 2024.
  • Board decision: 23 March 2025; seven recommendations accepted, at least six changed.
  • Immovable property details of the chairperson, WTMs, Executive Directors and Chief General Managers will be made public.

What the board decided

OutcomeItem
AcceptedTreat WTMs and chairpersons as insiders; align their investment curbs with those for employees; widen the definition of family
ModifiedAssets and liabilities disclosure kept within an internal mechanism (proposed Office of Ethics and Compliance), not made fully public
Not adoptedExtending investment curbs on spouses and dependent relatives to unlisted securities

Background concepts

  • SEBI: statutory securities market regulator under the SEBI Act, 1992, headquartered in Mumbai.
  • Conflict of interest: personal interest could improperly sway official decisions, such as a member holding shares in regulated firms.
  • Insider trading: dealing using unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI), regulated by the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. Board members were earlier not classed as insiders.
  • WTMs: full-time board members who take part in regulatory decisions.
  • Office of Ethics and Compliance: proposed internal body for confidential disclosures by senior officials.

The code versus the rules

InstrumentApplies toNature
SEBI Code on Conflict of Interests for Members of Board, 2008Board membersVoluntary, no penalties, so largely unenforceable
SEBI (Employees Service) Regulations, 2001EmployeesEnforceable

Concerns

  • Members, including WTMs and the chairperson, had lighter norms than employees and could trade without limits.
  • Dropping full public disclosure weakens transparency.
  • Leaving out unlisted securities is a loophole: unlisted entities could be used to dodge curbs on listed ones.

Exam angle

  • Committee chair: Pratyush Sinha (ex-CVC).
  • SEBI Act year: 1992; insider trading regulations: 2015.
  • Code of 2008 is voluntary; 2001 employee rules are enforceable.
  • Proposed body: Office of Ethics and Compliance.

Test yourself

1. Who headed the high-level committee that reviewed SEBI's conflict of interest framework?

Former CVC Pratyush Sinha headed the committee.

2. What is the nature of the SEBI Code on Conflict of Interests for Members of Board, 2008?

The notes say the Code is voluntary and lacks penalties.

3. Which item did SEBI's board keep out of the curbs on spouses and dependent family members?

Unlisted securities were kept out, which creates a loophole.