Skip to content

RBI Tells Supreme Court It Met Duties in Subvention Scam

10 June 20251 min read
BANKING & FINANCERBI Tells SupremeCourt It Met Dutiesin SubventionScam10 June 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

After many homebuyers alleged harassment and fraud over misused loans, the Supreme Court is examining how banks and developers ran subvention housing schemes. The RBI filed its response.

Key facts

  • Subvention scheme: the bank pays loan money directly to the builder, who must pay EMIs until possession.
  • Many builders defaulted on EMIs and construction; banks then chased innocent buyers.
  • Court action: CBI probe, plus bar on coercive recovery and cheque bounce cases against buyers.
RBI pointDetail
AffidavitRegulatory duties under the Banking Regulation Act were fulfilled
2015 guidelinesDisbursal tied to construction stages; none upfront
August 2022 circularEthical, non-coercive recovery
AdmissionBanks released funds before verifying progress

Concerns

  • Banks allegedly ignored norms, letting builders siphon funds.
  • RBI says enforcement lies in banks’ operational discretion.

Current status

  • CBI probe on; RBI denies liability.
  • Court likely to fix accountability across regulators, lenders and developers.

Exam angle

  • Law cited: Banking Regulation Act.
  • Agency: CBI.

Test yourself

1. Which agency did the Supreme Court direct to probe the builder-bank nexus in subvention housing schemes?

The court ordered a CBI probe.

2. In a subvention scheme as described, who is expected to pay EMIs until the buyer gets possession?

Builders were required to pay the EMIs until possession.

3. RBI's 2015 guidelines on home loan disbursal required what?

Loan disbursals had to be linked to construction stages, with no upfront release for incomplete projects.