Skip to content

RBI OMO Purchase of ₹80,000 Crore to Add Liquidity

2 April 20251 min read
BANKING & FINANCERBI OMO Purchaseof ₹80,000 Croreto Add Liquidity2 April 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

RBI decided to buy government bonds worth ₹80,000 crore to pump money into banks so that policy rate cuts pass through to borrowers, just before the April Monetary Policy Committee meeting.

Key facts

  • Instrument: open market operation (OMO) purchase of government securities.
  • Schedule: four tranches of ₹20,000 crore on April 3, 8, 22 and 29.
  • MPC meeting: April 7-9; a second straight 25 bps repo cut was expected.
  • Last repo cut: 25 bps in February, after 11 meetings with rates unchanged.
  • Target: liquidity surplus of ₹1-2 trillion.
Liquidity measureValue
Net liquidity surplus (Sunday)₹89,398 crore
Core liquidity surplus (March 21)₹1.1 trillion
Injected since January 2024 (OMOs, swaps, repos)Over ₹5 trillion
Repos maturing in early April₹1.8 trillion

Background

  • Liquidity turned surplus for the first time in four months, helped by heavy government spending near the financial year-end.
  • Surplus liquidity speeds up monetary transmission to lower borrowing costs.

Concerns

  • EBLR-linked loans have fallen, but MCLR (which affects corporate loans) has barely moved.
  • Banks had not cut deposit rates because liquidity had earlier been tight.
  • Economists read the OMO as a signal of continued easing, with a dovish tilt expected.

Exam angle

  • OMO means buying or selling government securities to manage liquidity.
  • EBLR is tied to the repo rate; MCLR is a cost-of-funds benchmark.
  • Know the tranche size and the dates.

Test yourself

1. RBI announced an OMO purchase of what total amount, ahead of the April MPC meeting?

The OMO purchase was ₹80,000 crore in four tranches of ₹20,000 crore.

2. RBI's OMO tranches of ₹20,000 crore each were scheduled on which dates?

The purchases were set for April 3, 8, 22 and 29.

3. Which lending benchmark, affecting corporate loans, had not fallen much despite the February repo cut?

MCLR-based rates stayed sticky while EBLR-linked loans declined.