Manipur CM Resignation: Constitutional Provisions Explained
Why in the news
N. Biren Singh quit as Manipur’s Chief Minister on 9 February 2025, and neither the ruling BJP nor the Opposition was placed to claim government formation, raising questions on constitutional options.
Key facts
- The Assembly’s last sitting: 12 August 2024; the Constitution bars a gap of more than six months between two sessions.
- Article 174(1) does not list a breach of this gap as a ground for dissolving the Assembly.
- In Bharatbhai Bhagwanjibhai v. State of Gujarat (2002) the Supreme Court held that the gap alone cannot justify President’s Rule under Article 356.
- Under Article 164 the Governor appoints the Chief Minister, inviting the leader of the majority party or coalition.
If President’s Rule follows
| Step | Effect |
|---|---|
| Governor’s message | Reports to the President a basis for constitutional crisis |
| State government | Kept in abeyance |
| Administration | Governor exercises powers under Union Government direction |
| Assembly | May be prorogued or dissolved |
Exam angle
- CM appointment: Article 164; emergency in states: Article 356.
- Case: Bharatbhai Bhagwanjibhai v. State of Gujarat (2002).