Skip to content

Governor’s Assent to Bills: Supreme Court Sets Timelines

20 August 20251 min read
NATIONAL AFFAIRSGovernor’s Assentto Bills: SupremeCourt SetsTimelines20 August 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

The Supreme Court rebuked the Tamil Nadu Governor for stalling 10 bills and fixed deadlines for such decisions for the first time.

Key facts

  • Article 200: Governor may assent, withhold or reserve a bill.
  • Article 201: President’s power over reserved bills.
  • Article 142: used to declare the bills deemed assented.
  • The Governor has no discretion, acts on ministerial advice, and cannot exercise an absolute or pocket veto.
  • A bill passed again cannot be reserved unless its content is materially changed.
SituationLimit
Withhold or reserve, on ministers’ advice1 month
Withhold and return, without that advice3 months
Bill passed a second time1 month

Principles

  • Delay offends federalism and democracy; missed deadlines invite judicial review.
  • The Governor should be a facilitator, a friend, philosopher and guide.

Exam angle

  • Articles 200, 201, 142.
  • Ten bills; timelines 1, 3 and 1 months.

Test yourself

1. Which Article gives the Governor the options to assent, withhold assent or reserve a bill for the President?

Article 200 lists the Governor's choices on bills.

2. How many Tamil Nadu bills did the Supreme Court hold were wrongly reserved by the Governor and declared deemed assented?

The ruling concerned 10 re-passed bills.

3. Which Article did the Supreme Court invoke to treat the bills as deemed assented?

It used its power under Article 142 for complete justice.