Skip to content

Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill: Aims and Objections

29 July 20251 min read
NATIONAL AFFAIRSMaharashtraSpecial PublicSecurity Bill: Aimsand Objections29 July 2025safalsetu.com

Why in the news

Maharashtra’s new security law against urban Naxal networks drew debate over misuse.

Key facts

  • First brought in the 2024 monsoon session under the earlier Mahayuti government.
  • Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have comparable Public Security Acts.

Concerns

  • Groups can be banned without due process, with no time cap.
  • Unlawful activity is loosely defined and could include peaceful dissent.
  • Section 2(f) penalises gestures or speech that merely cause concern, with no need for violence or intent.
  • No lower court jurisdiction; officials acting in good faith are protected.
  • Student groups, farmers’ bodies and opposition activists may be targeted.

Exam angle

  • LWE: Left-Wing Extremism.
  • Contested provision: Section 2(f).

Test yourself

1. Which state legislature passed the Special Public Security Bill aimed at urban Naxal fronts?

The Maharashtra Legislature passed the Bill.

2. Which provision of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill was criticised for requiring no violence or intent?

Section 2(f) criminalises signs, speech or gestures that merely cause concern.

3. Which of these states already has a similar Public Security Act, as per the notes?

Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have similar acts.