Skip to content

Passive Euthanasia: Supreme Court Applies Framework First Time

16 March 20261 min read
NATIONAL AFFAIRSPassive Euthanasia:Supreme CourtApplies FrameworkFirst Time16 March 2026safalsetu.com

Why in the news

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, the first use of its passive euthanasia guidelines.

Key facts

  • Euthanasia: intentional ending of life to relieve suffering (mercy killing).
  • Active (for instance lethal injection): illegal.
  • Passive (withholding or withdrawing ventilators or feeding tubes): permitted under strict guidelines.

Legal evolution

CasePosition
P. Rathinam (1994)Right to life includes right to die; suicide effectively decriminalised
Gian KaurOverturned it; Article 21 excludes right to die but admits dying with dignity
Aruna ShanbaugFirst allowance of passive euthanasia, with High Court approval
Common CauseDying with dignity is a fundamental right; Advance Medical Directives legal
2023 guidelinesJudicial Magistrate’s countersignature on living wills dropped

Exam angle

  • Article 21; living will = Advance Medical Directive.

Test yourself

1. Which case first allowed passive euthanasia in India under strict conditions with High Court approval?

The Aruna Shanbaug case allowed it first, as per the notes.

2. In the Supreme Court's passive euthanasia framework, what did the 2023 guidelines remove for living wills?

The 2023 guidelines dropped the Judicial Magistrate's countersignature.

3. For how many years had Harish Rana, in whose case the passive euthanasia framework was first applied, been in a persistent vegetative state?

He had remained in that state for 13 years.