Daily Current Affairs in English & Hindi | Exam Preparation 2026

Get exam-focused Current Affairs 2026 in simple language with daily news analysis, MCQs, PDFs, and important updates for UPSC, SSC, Banking, Railway, Defence, and State Exams.

National News

1. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) Episode, 2026

Summary

The Central Government invoked Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 to block the website and social media handles of the newly formed Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) — a satirical online movement launched by a 30-year-old student in response to a Chief Justice of India (CJI) courtroom remark. Within ten days, the movement amassed over 2 crore followers across digital platforms, channeling Gen Z anger over the NEET-UG 2024 paper leak, structural unemployment, and perceived institutional apathy.

Key dimensions of the episode include:

• The first major instance of Section 69A being deployed against a satire-led, individual-driven political-style movement.
• A digital-first political mobilization with zero registered office, no ground volunteers, and no Election Commission recognition.
• State intelligence assessments flagging the possibility of transnational influence operations exploiting youth grievances.
• A renewed national debate on the constitutionality of opaque blocking orders in light of Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015).
• A widening generational rift between digitally native dissent and conventional party-based politics.

Background & Concept

What is the Gen Z–Democracy Interface?

Gen Z and Democracy refers to the evolving relationship between the youngest voting cohort — those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 — and established democratic institutions. Unlike Millennials or Gen X, whose political lives began with physical, grassroots mobilization (rallies, padyatras, student unions), Gen Z experiences democracy primarily as a digital-first, heavily networked phenomenon. Their political identity is shaped on Instagram reels, X (Twitter) threads, WhatsApp forwards, Discord servers, and YouTube long-form commentary — rather than through party-based ideological frameworks.

Generational Map of Indian Voters

Generation	Birth Years	Primary Political Medium	Defining Movements
Boomers	1946–1964	Print, public rallies	Emergency (1975–77), JP Movement
Gen X	1965–1980	Television, press	Mandal, Babri, 1991 Liberalization
Millennials	1981–1996	Web 2.0, blogs	India Against Corruption (2011), Nirbhaya (2012)
Gen Z	1997–2012	Reels, X, Discord, memes	Anti-CAA (2019–20), Farm Laws, CJP (2026)
Gen Alpha	2013 onwards	AI-native interfaces	Emerging

About Section 69A, IT Act 2000

• Empowers the Central Government to block public access to online information in the interest of: sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, or for preventing incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence relating to the above.
• Procedure governed by the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
• Rule 16 imposes confidentiality on blocking orders — limiting public and judicial transparency.
• Constitutional validity upheld in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the same judgment that struck down the vague Section 66A.

Key Frameworks & Doctrines Referenced

• Section 69A, IT Act 2000 — Statutory blocking power; procedural safeguards under IT Blocking Rules, 2009.
• Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) — Struck down Section 66A; upheld Section 69A subject to procedural safeguards.
• Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) — Held internet access integral to Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g); mandated proportionality test for internet shutdowns.
• Article 19(1)(a) & 19(2) — Freedom of speech and expression, subject to “reasonable restrictions” on grounds of sovereignty, integrity, security, public order, decency, morality, contempt, defamation, or incitement.
• IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 — Govern social media intermediaries, OTT platforms, and digital news media.
• Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 — India’s first comprehensive data protection law.
• SVEEP (2009) — Election Commission’s flagship voter education and participation programme.
• MY Bharat (Mera Yuva Bharat), 2023 — Autonomous body under the Ministry of Youth Affairs as a “phygital” platform for youth-government engagement.
• Rashtriya Yuva Sashaktikaran Karyakram (RYSK) — Umbrella youth scheme covering NYKS, NSS, and National Youth Corps.
• AI Impact Summit (New Delhi, February 2026) — Building on Bletchley (2023) and Seoul (2024); committed to safe, inclusive, human-centric AI relevant to electoral and democratic integrity.

Key Aspects of the CJP Episode

Dimension	Detail
Trigger	A Chief Justice of India (CJI) courtroom remark; founder mobilized online response
Founder Profile	A 30-year-old student; no prior political affiliation
Scale	Over 2 crore followers across social media in under 10 days
Underlying Grievances	NEET-UG paper leak (2024), unemployment, exam integrity, institutional apathy
State Response	Section 69A invoked; website and handles blocked under sealed orders
National-Security Lens	Concerns over possible transnational influence operations
Ground Presence	Zero registered office, no on-ground volunteers, no ECI registration
Discourse Style	Satire, memes, cockroach metaphor — symbolizing resilience and resistance

India’s Position

India’s response to digital-age democratic disruption must balance constitutional liberty with state capacity:

• Constitutional anchor: Article 19(1)(a) and 19(2) provide the rights-restrictions framework; Articles 14 and 21 add procedural fairness and due process; Article 324 vests electoral oversight in the Election Commission of India.
• Statutory architecture: IT Act, 2000, IT Rules, 2021, DPDP Act, 2023, and the proposed Digital India Act (to replace the IT Act).
• Judicial benchmarks: Shreya Singhal v. UoI (2015) on online free speech; Anuradha Bhasin v. UoI (2020) on internet shutdowns; K.S. Puttaswamy v. UoI (2017) on the right to privacy.
• Institutional mechanisms: ECI (SVEEP, ECINET), MeitY, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, PIB Fact-Check Unit, National Cyber Coordination Centre (NCCC), CERT-In.
• Comparable global frameworks: EU Digital Services Act (2022), UK Online Safety Act (2023), US Section 230 reform debate, Singapore’s POFMA — India’s approach is being finalized via the upcoming Digital India Act.
• Youth-engagement schemes: RYSK, MY Bharat (2023), National Youth Parliament, Yuva Sangam, and ECI’s “Turning 18” campaign.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ Gen Z: Cohort born roughly between 1997 and 2012; the first fully digital-native generation on India’s electoral rolls.

▸ Section 69A, IT Act 2000: Empowers the Central Government to block public access to online information on specified grounds; operationalized through the IT Blocking Rules, 2009.

▸ IT Blocking Rules, 2009: Procedural framework under Section 69A; Rule 16 imposes confidentiality on blocking orders.

▸ Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): Landmark Supreme Court judgment that struck down Section 66A as unconstitutional and upheld Section 69A subject to procedural safeguards.

▸ Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020): Supreme Court ruling that internet access is integral to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) and trade under 19(1)(g); restrictions must satisfy the proportionality test.

▸ K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): Nine-judge bench unanimously recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.

▸ Article 19(1)(a): Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and expression to all citizens.

▸ Article 19(2): Permits “reasonable restrictions” on free speech on grounds of sovereignty, integrity, security, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement.

▸ 61st Constitutional Amendment, 1989: Amended Article 326 to reduce the voting age from 21 to 18 years.

▸ SVEEP (Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation): ECI’s flagship voter education programme since 2009.

▸ MY Bharat (Mera Yuva Bharat): Autonomous body launched in 2023 under the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports as a “phygital” platform for youth empowerment.

▸ Rashtriya Yuva Sashaktikaran Karyakram (RYSK): Umbrella scheme of the Ministry of Youth Affairs covering NYKS, NSS, National Youth Corps, and others.

▸ NEET-UG (2024) Paper Leak: National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate medical) faced widespread allegations of paper leaks and irregularities in 2024, triggering protests and a CBI investigation.

▸ IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021: Govern social-media intermediaries, OTT platforms, and digital news media in India.

▸ Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023: India’s first comprehensive data protection law; gives effect to the right to informational privacy recognized in Puttaswamy.

▸ Digital India Act (Proposed): Forthcoming legislation envisioned to replace the IT Act, 2000 with a modern framework covering AI, deepfakes, and online harms.

▸ AI Impact Summit, New Delhi (February 2026): Continued the global AI summit series after Bletchley (2023) and Seoul (2024); focused on safe, inclusive, human-centric AI relevant to democratic integrity in the age of deepfakes.

▸ Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour (CIB): Use of fake accounts and bot networks to manipulate online political discourse; commonly flagged by platforms like Meta and X.

▸ Echo Chamber / Filter Bubble: Algorithmic phenomena where users are exposed predominantly to information reinforcing existing beliefs, amplifying polarization.

▸ Election Commission of India (ECI): Constitutional body under Article 324 responsible for conducting free and fair elections.

▸ Yuva Sansad (Youth Parliament): Initiative under the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs familiarizing youth with parliamentary procedure and democratic ethos.

▸ Cockroach Janta Party (CJP): Satirical online movement launched in 2026 by a 30-year-old student; central case study on digital dissent, Section 69A, and Gen Z mobilization.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 empowers the Central Government to block public access to information in the interest of all the following, EXCEPT:

(a) Sovereignty and integrity of India (b) Security of the State (c) Promotion of trade and commerce (d) Preventing incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence

Q2. The Supreme Court judgment in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) is associated with:

(a) Striking down Section 66A of the IT Act (b) Upholding Section 69A subject to procedural safeguards (c) Recognizing the right to privacy as a fundamental right (d) Both (a) and (b)

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the IT (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009:

1. They are framed under Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.
2. They mandate a public hearing before any blocking order is issued.
3. Rule 16 imposes a confidentiality requirement on blocking orders.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q4. The voting age in India was reduced from 21 years to 18 years through which Constitutional Amendment?

(a) 42nd Amendment, 1976 (b) 44th Amendment, 1978 (c) 61st Amendment, 1989 (d) 73rd Amendment, 1992

Q5. Consider the following statements about Gen Z and digital political mobilization in India:

1. Gen Z refers broadly to those born between 1997 and 2012.
2. India’s 61st Constitutional Amendment, 1989 reduced the voting age to 18 years.
3. The Election Commission’s SVEEP programme is targeted exclusively at first-time voters in rural areas.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q6. Which Article of the Indian Constitution provides for “reasonable restrictions” on the freedom of speech and expression?

(a) Article 19(1)(a) (b) Article 19(2) (c) Article 21 (d) Article 25

Q7. Consider the following statements regarding “MY Bharat” (Mera Yuva Bharat):

1. It was launched in 2023 under the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports.
2. It is conceived as a “phygital” platform for youth empowerment.
3. It replaces the Election Commission of India’s SVEEP programme.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q8. The Supreme Court judgment in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) primarily dealt with:

(a) Section 66A of the IT Act (b) Internet shutdowns and the right to free speech online (c) The right to privacy (d) Aadhaar and biometric data

Q9. The AI Impact Summit, held in New Delhi (February 2026), is part of a global series. Two earlier summits in the same series were held at:

(a) Geneva and Tokyo (b) Bletchley Park and Seoul (c) Brussels and Sydney (d) San Francisco and London

Q10. Match the following Indian legal/institutional instruments with their core function:

Instrument	Function
A. Section 69A, IT Act	1. Voter education and participation
B. SVEEP	2. Blocking public access to online information
C. Article 324	3. Data protection and privacy
D. DPDP Act, 2023	4. Constitutional basis of the Election Commission

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3 (b) A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4 (c) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3 (d) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (c) Promotion of trade and commerce. Section 69A grounds are restricted to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, and prevention of incitement to any cognizable offence. Trade and commerce is not a ground.

▸ Q2 → (d) Both (a) and (b). In Shreya Singhal v. UoI (2015), the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A as unconstitutional and simultaneously upheld Section 69A along with the 2009 Blocking Rules, subject to procedural safeguards.

▸ Q3 → (c) 1 and 3 only. The 2009 Rules are framed under Section 69A, and Rule 16 imposes confidentiality on blocking orders. Statement 2 is wrong — the Rules do not mandate a public hearing; only the originator/intermediary is given an opportunity to be heard in a closed proceeding.

▸ Q4 → (c) 61st Amendment, 1989. The 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1989 amended Article 326 to reduce the voting age from 21 to 18 years.

▸ Q5 → (a) 1 and 2 only. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong — SVEEP targets all voter cohorts (urban, rural, women, youth, persons with disabilities, service voters, etc.), not just rural first-time voters.

▸ Q6 → (b) Article 19(2). Article 19(2) permits the State to impose “reasonable restrictions” on the rights guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a). Article 19(1)(a) provides the right itself.

▸ Q7 → (a) 1 and 2 only. MY Bharat was launched in 2023 as a “phygital” (physical + digital) platform under the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports. It does not replace SVEEP, which is run by the Election Commission of India.

▸ Q8 → (b) Internet shutdowns and the right to free speech online. In Anuradha Bhasin v. UoI (2020), the Supreme Court held that internet access is integral to the freedoms under Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g), and that restrictions must satisfy the proportionality test.

▸ Q9 → (b) Bletchley Park and Seoul. The AI Impact Summit, New Delhi (February 2026) followed the AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park, UK (2023) and the AI Seoul Summit, South Korea (2024) in the global summit series.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3. Section 69A → blocking online information; SVEEP → voter education and participation; Article 324 → constitutional basis of the ECI; DPDP Act, 2023 → data protection and privacy.

2. 11th Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), New York (2026)

Source: News on Air

Summary

The 11th Review Conference (RevCon) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) at the UN Headquarters in New York collapsed without consensus on a final declaration — extending an unbroken streak of three failed RevCons (2015, 2022, 2026) and deepening the structural crisis of the global non-proliferation regime.

Key takeaways from the failed Conference include:

• No consensus final document — the P5 (United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China) blocked explicit disarmament timelines from successive draft declarations.
• Renewed contestation over Article VI — the disarmament pledge by Nuclear-Weapon States (NWS) — amid active vertical proliferation and modernization of arsenals.
• Sharper non-signatory paradox with India, Pakistan, Israel outside the treaty and North Korea having withdrawn in 2003.
• Growing concerns over hypersonic, dual-capable, and AI-enabled delivery systems outpacing the IAEA’s verification toolkit.
• NATO nuclear-sharing controversies — including redeployment of US tactical warheads to the UK and an expanded French air-nuclear umbrella over European partners — challenged as a violation of NPT principles.
• A reactivated push by the Global South for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW, 2017) as a parallel disarmament track.

Background & Concept

What is the NPT Review Conference?

The NPT Review Conference is a high-level plurilateral diplomatic forum held every five years to assess implementation, structural health, and modernization of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Initiated in 1975, the month-long sessions bring together 191 signatory states to review past disarmament pledges, examine IAEA safeguard protocols, and address emerging geopolitical flashpoints threatening the global non-proliferation architecture. RevCons aim to adopt a consensus final document outlining forward action plans.

Snapshot of NPT Review Conferences

RevCon	Year	Venue	Key Outcome
1st	1975	Geneva	First implementation review
5th	1995	New York	Indefinite extension of NPT
6th	2000	New York	“13 Practical Steps” on disarmament adopted
8th	2010	New York	64-point Action Plan adopted
9th	2015	New York	Failed — Middle East WMD-Free Zone deadlock
10th	2022	New York	Failed — Russia blocked over Ukraine/Zaporizhzhia plant
11th	2026	New York	Collapsed — no final declaration

Key Features of the NPT (Signed 1968, in force 1970)

• Tripartite Pillars Framework:
  • Pillar 1 — Non-proliferation (Articles I, II, III): NNWS undertake never to acquire nuclear weapons; NWS undertake not to transfer them.
  • Pillar 2 — Disarmament (Article VI): All parties pledge to pursue, in good faith, negotiations on cessation of the nuclear arms race and complete disarmament.
  • Pillar 3 — Peaceful Uses (Article IV): Guarantees the “inalienable right” to peaceful nuclear technology — civilian electricity, medical isotopes, agricultural mutation breeding, research.
• The Cut-Off Date: Recognizes only five nations as legitimate Nuclear-Weapon States — those that manufactured and exploded a nuclear device prior to 1 January 1967: the United States, Russia (then USSR), United Kingdom, France, and China — the P5.
• IAEA Safeguards Matrix: Empowers the International Atomic Energy Agency to conduct mandatory on-site inspections of NNWS facilities under Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements (CSAs) and the Additional Protocol (1997).
• Indefinite Extension (1995): Originally drafted for an initial 25-year term, the treaty was extended indefinitely and unconditionally at the 5th RevCon (New York, 1995).
• Signatory Universality: With 191 states parties, the NPT is the most widely adhered to arms control treaty in history — only India, Israel, Pakistan, and South Sudan are outside (North Korea withdrew in 2003).

About the IAEA

• International Atomic Energy Agency — autonomous UN-affiliated body, established 1957 under the “Atoms for Peace” initiative; headquartered in Vienna.
• Reports to both the UN General Assembly and Security Council.
• Runs safeguards inspections under the NPT; awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, 2005 (jointly with Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei).

Key Frameworks & Doctrines Referenced

• Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), 1968 — Three pillars: non-proliferation, disarmament, peaceful uses.
• Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), 1996 — Bans all nuclear explosions; not yet in force (eight Annex 2 states, including India, China, the US, have not ratified).
• Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) — Proposed treaty in the Conference on Disarmament (Geneva) to ban production of fissile material for weapons; stalled for over two decades.
• Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), 2017 — Adopted at UN; entered into force 22 January 2021; no NWS is a party.
• New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty), 2010 — US-Russia bilateral cap on strategic warheads; extended in 2021; expires February 2026.
• Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), 1974 — 48-member multilateral export control regime; India granted a clean waiver in 2008 but NSG membership blocked by China.
• MTCR (1987), Wassenaar Arrangement (1996), Australia Group (1985) — Other export control regimes; India joined MTCR (2016), Wassenaar (2017), Australia Group (2018).
• IAEA Additional Protocol, 1997 — Strengthens IAEA’s inspection authority beyond CSA.
• India–US Civil Nuclear Agreement (“123 Agreement”), 2008 — Operationalized India’s separation of civil and military nuclear facilities under IAEA-India Safeguards Agreement (2009).

Key Aspects of the 11th RevCon Outcome

Domain	Outcome
Final Declaration	No consensus; no agreed outcome document
Article VI (Disarmament)	P5 blocked explicit disarmament timelines from draft texts
Vertical Proliferation	Concerns over P5 modernization and warhead expansion
Horizontal Proliferation	Renewed worries on illicit transfers and non-state actors
Verification Gap	Hypersonic, dual-capable, AI-enabled systems outpace IAEA tools
Nuclear Sharing	NATO nuclear sharing arrangements challenged as non-compliant
Non-Signatory Paradox	India, Pakistan, Israel outside; North Korea withdrew (2003)
TPNW Pressure	Global South push for TPNW as parallel disarmament track

India’s Position

India’s engagement with the global non-proliferation architecture is principled, layered, and consistently strategic:

• NPT Status: India has never signed the NPT, terming it “discriminatory” for sanctifying the P5’s monopoly while denying others equal rights — captured in the doctrinal stance of “universal, non-discriminatory, and verifiable nuclear disarmament.”
• Weapons Programme: Conducted Pokhran-I (Smiling Buddha, 1974) as a “peaceful nuclear explosion” and Pokhran-II (Operation Shakti, 1998) under PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee — emerging as a declared nuclear power.
• Nuclear Doctrine (2003): Built around Credible Minimum Deterrence (CMD), a No First Use (NFU) posture, massive retaliation in response to a nuclear strike, and civilian political control via the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA) chaired by the Prime Minister.
• Civil Nuclear Mainstreaming: NSG clean waiver (2008) enabled the India–US 123 Agreement (2008), IAEA-India Safeguards Agreement (2009), and bilateral civil nuclear deals with France, Russia, Japan, Australia, Canada, the UK, and others.
• Export-Control Memberships: MTCR (2016), Wassenaar Arrangement (2017), Australia Group (2018) — entry into the NSG remains blocked by China, citing India’s non-NPT status.
• CTBT and FMCT: India has not signed the CTBT but maintains a voluntary, unilateral moratorium on nuclear tests since 1998; supports a non-discriminatory, verifiable FMCT.
• TPNW: India has not signed the TPNW (2017), holding that genuine disarmament requires a comprehensive, verifiable convention at the Conference on Disarmament (Geneva).
• Domestic Architecture: Department of Atomic Energy (DAE, 1954), Atomic Energy Commission (1948), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC, Trombay), Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL), Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam (BHAVINI), and the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB).
• Three-Stage Nuclear Programme (designed by Dr. Homi J. Bhabha): Stage 1 — PHWRs on natural uranium; Stage 2 — Fast Breeder Reactors using plutonium; Stage 3 — Thorium-based reactors leveraging India’s vast thorium reserves.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ NPT (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons): Multilateral arms-control treaty opened for signature in 1968; entered into force in 1970; 191 states parties; indefinitely extended in 1995.

▸ NPT Review Conference: Plurilateral conference held every five years since 1975 to review the treaty’s implementation; aims at a consensus final document.

▸ Three Pillars of the NPT: Non-proliferation, Disarmament (Article VI), and Peaceful Uses of nuclear energy (Article IV).

▸ Nuclear-Weapon States (NWS) / P5: The five states that manufactured and exploded a nuclear device before 1 January 1967 — United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China. They are also the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.

▸ Non-Nuclear-Weapon States (NNWS): All other NPT parties, who pledge not to acquire nuclear weapons.

▸ Article VI: Obligation on all parties to pursue good-faith negotiations on cessation of the nuclear arms race and complete disarmament.

▸ IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency): Established 1957, headquartered in Vienna; conducts safeguards inspections under the NPT; 2005 Nobel Peace Prize (jointly with Mohamed ElBaradei).

▸ IAEA Safeguards / Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (CSA): Mandatory inspection regime for NNWS to verify peaceful use of nuclear material.

▸ Additional Protocol (1997): Supplements the CSA by giving the IAEA broader inspection rights, including undeclared sites.

▸ CTBT (Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty), 1996: Bans all nuclear explosions; not yet in force as eight Annex 2 states have not ratified.

▸ FMCT (Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty): Proposed treaty in the Geneva Conference on Disarmament to ban production of fissile material for weapons; stalled.

▸ TPNW (Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons), 2017: First legally binding treaty to ban nuclear weapons; in force from 22 January 2021; no NWS is a party. India, Pakistan, Israel are also outside.

▸ New START Treaty, 2010: Bilateral US–Russia strategic arms reduction treaty; capped deployed strategic warheads at 1,550 each; expires February 2026.

▸ NSG (Nuclear Suppliers Group): 48-member multilateral export control regime, founded in 1974 after India’s Pokhran-I test; India received a clean waiver in 2008 but is not a member.

▸ MTCR, Wassenaar Arrangement, Australia Group: Other multilateral export-control regimes; India is a member of all three.

▸ Conference on Disarmament (CD), Geneva: Sole multilateral forum for negotiating arms control treaties; venue for FMCT negotiations.

▸ Pokhran-I (Smiling Buddha), 1974: India’s first nuclear test, conducted as a “Peaceful Nuclear Explosion.”

▸ Pokhran-II (Operation Shakti), 1998: Five nuclear tests conducted by India in May 1998; followed by India’s nuclear doctrine declaration.

▸ India’s Nuclear Doctrine (2003): Credible Minimum Deterrence, No First Use (NFU), massive retaliation, civilian political control via the Nuclear Command Authority.

▸ 123 Agreement (India–US Civil Nuclear Agreement), 2008: Operationalized civil nuclear cooperation between India and the US after the NSG waiver.

▸ Three-Stage Nuclear Programme: Designed by Dr. Homi J. Bhabha; PHWRs → FBRs → Thorium-based reactors.

▸ Vertical Proliferation: Numerical or qualitative expansion of nuclear arsenals by states that already possess them.

▸ Horizontal Proliferation: Spread of nuclear weapons to additional states or non-state actors.

▸ Extended Deterrence / Nuclear Sharing: Practice of NWS extending their nuclear umbrella to allies; e.g., NATO nuclear-sharing arrangements involving US tactical warheads in Europe.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT):

(a) Was opened for signature in 1968 and entered into force in 1970 (b) Has 191 states parties (c) Was extended indefinitely at the 1995 Review Conference (d) All of the above

Q2. Which of the following are recognized as Nuclear-Weapon States (NWS) under the NPT?

1. United States
2. Russia
3. United Kingdom
4. France
5. China
6. India

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 only (b) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 only (c) 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 only (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Q3. The NPT recognizes a state as a Nuclear-Weapon State only if it manufactured and exploded a nuclear device prior to:

(a) 1 January 1965 (b) 1 January 1967 (c) 1 January 1970 (d) 1 January 1972

Q4. Consider the following statements regarding India’s status vis-à-vis the global non-proliferation regime:

1. India is a signatory to the NPT but not to the CTBT.
2. India received a clean waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) in 2008.
3. India is a member of the MTCR, Wassenaar Arrangement, and Australia Group.
4. India’s nuclear doctrine, declared in 2003, is based on Credible Minimum Deterrence with a No First Use posture.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2 and 4 only

Q5. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA):

(a) Is headquartered in Geneva (b) Is headquartered in Vienna (c) Is headquartered in New York (d) Is headquartered in The Hague

Q6. Consider the following statements regarding the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW):

1. It was adopted at the United Nations in 2017.
2. It entered into force on 22 January 2021.
3. India and all five NPT-recognized Nuclear-Weapon States are parties to it.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q7. Article VI of the NPT relates to:

(a) The right to peaceful nuclear technology (b) IAEA safeguards on non-nuclear-weapon states (c) Good-faith negotiations on disarmament (d) Withdrawal procedures from the treaty

Q8. Consider the following statements about India’s nuclear programme:

1. India conducted its first nuclear test, code-named “Smiling Buddha,” in 1974.
2. The Pokhran-II tests in May 1998 were conducted under Operation Shakti.
3. India’s Three-Stage Nuclear Programme was conceptualized by Dr. Vikram Sarabhai.
4. The Nuclear Command Authority is chaired by the Prime Minister of India.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 3 and 4 only

Q9. Which of the following states are NOT parties to the NPT?

1. India
2. Pakistan
3. Israel
4. South Africa

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 3 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q10. Match the following treaties/arrangements with their primary purpose:

Treaty/Arrangement	Purpose
A. CTBT	1. Bilateral US–Russia strategic arms reduction
B. FMCT (Proposed)	2. Ban on all nuclear explosions
C. TPNW	3. Ban on production of fissile material for weapons
D. New START	4. Comprehensive ban on nuclear weapons

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1 (b) A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4 (c) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1 (d) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (d) All of the above. The NPT was opened for signature in 1968 and entered into force in 1970; it has 191 states parties, making it the most widely adhered to arms control treaty; and it was extended indefinitely at the 5th Review Conference, New York, 1995.

▸ Q2 → (a) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 only. The five NPT-recognized Nuclear-Weapon States (the P5) are the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and China — also the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. India is not recognized as a NWS under the NPT.

▸ Q3 → (b) 1 January 1967. The NPT defines a Nuclear-Weapon State as one that manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.

▸ Q4 → (b) 2, 3 and 4 only. Statement 1 is wrong — India is neither a signatory to the NPT nor the CTBT; it maintains a voluntary unilateral moratorium on nuclear tests since 1998. Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct.

▸ Q5 → (b) Vienna. The IAEA, established in 1957 under the “Atoms for Peace” initiative, is headquartered in Vienna, Austria.

▸ Q6 → (a) 1 and 2 only. The TPNW was adopted in 2017 and entered into force on 22 January 2021. Statement 3 is wrong — none of the NPT-recognized Nuclear-Weapon States (and none of India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) is a party to the TPNW.

▸ Q7 → (c) Good-faith negotiations on disarmament. Article VI of the NPT obligates all parties to pursue, in good faith, negotiations on cessation of the nuclear arms race and on complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.

▸ Q8 → (b) 1, 2 and 4 only. Statement 3 is wrong — India’s Three-Stage Nuclear Programme was conceptualized by Dr. Homi J. Bhabha, not Dr. Vikram Sarabhai. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct.

▸ Q9 → (a) 1, 2 and 3 only. India, Pakistan, and Israel have never signed the NPT. South Africa, on the other hand, voluntarily dismantled its nuclear weapons in 1991 and acceded to the NPT in 1991 as a Non-Nuclear-Weapon State — the only state to have done so.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1. CTBT → ban on all nuclear explosions (1996); FMCT (proposed) → ban on production of fissile material for weapons; TPNW → comprehensive ban on nuclear weapons (2017); New START → bilateral US–Russia strategic arms reduction (2010).

3. The Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna (BHAVYA), 2026

Summary

The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, officially released the operational guidelines for the Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna (BHAVYA) — a flagship Central Sector Scheme designed to establish world-class, investment-ready, plug-and-play industrial smart cities across India. With a total outlay of ₹33,660 crore over six years (FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32), BHAVYA marks the most ambitious physical-infrastructure push for manufacturing in the post-PLI era.

Key features of the scheme include:

• Development of 100 industrial parks nationwide, with the first 50 selected via a challenge-based competitive framework among states and Union Territories.
• Financial assistance of up to ₹1 crore per acre, plus funding of up to 25% of the cost of external infrastructure for last-mile logistics connectivity.
• Execution through Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, with central support routed as equity contribution tied to state land transfer and project milestones.
• Project Management Agency: National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation (NICDC).
• Three-tier infrastructure framework — Core, Value-Added, and Social — covering everything from CETPs and underground utility corridors to ready-built sheds and on-site worker housing.
• Mandatory integration of every park layout with the PM GatiShakti National Master Plan GIS platform for multi-modal rail-road-port logistics connectivity.

By coupling ready-built infrastructure with streamlined regulatory approvals and multi-modal connectivity, BHAVYA seeks to dismantle long-standing entry barriers for global and domestic manufacturers — operationalizing the Make in India and Aatmanirbharta agendas while positioning India to capture supply-chain diversification opportunities under the China-Plus-One strategy, even as it navigates challenges around state land aggregation, environmental clearances, and labour mobility.

Background & Concept

What is BHAVYA?

Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna (BHAVYA) is a Central Sector Scheme of the Government of India aimed at developing 100 plug-and-play industrial smart cities with investment-grade core, value-added, and social infrastructure. The scheme is conceived as the core infrastructure engine for India’s manufacturing-led growth strategy — complementing demand-side instruments like the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes with supply-side, land-ready industrial parks. The Nodal Department is the DPIIT, and execution is anchored by the NICDC as Project Management Agency.

Evolution of India’s Industrial Infrastructure Push

Initiative	Year	Anchor Idea
National Manufacturing Policy	2011	National Investment & Manufacturing Zones (NIMZ)
Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC)	2007 onwards	First major industrial corridor; later expanded to multi-corridor model
Make in India	2014	25 priority sectors; ease-of-doing-business push
National Industrial Corridor Development Programme (NICDP)	2020 onwards	11 industrial corridors with 32 projects under NICDC
Aatmanirbhar Bharat	2020	Self-reliance across strategic sectors
PM GatiShakti National Master Plan	2021	Multi-modal logistics & GIS-based planning
BHAVYA	2026	100 plug-and-play industrial smart cities

About DPIIT and NICDC

• DPIIT (Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade): Under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry; renamed from DIPP in 2019 to expand its mandate to internal trade. Custodian of Make in India, Startup India, the Industrial Policy, National Single Window System (NSWS), and the National Logistics Policy (2022).
• NICDC (National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation): Earlier known as DMICDC; renamed in 2020 with an expanded mandate covering 11 industrial corridors including DMIC, CBIC (Chennai–Bengaluru), AKIC (Amritsar–Kolkata), EBIC (East Coast), HMIC (Hyderabad–Nagpur), and others.

Key Frameworks & Schemes Referenced

• BHAVYA, 2026 — Central Sector Scheme for 100 industrial smart cities; ₹33,660 crore over FY27–FY32.
• Make in India, 2014 — Flagship initiative across 25 priority sectors.
• Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, 2020 — Self-reliance framework under the Five Ls.
• National Industrial Corridor Development Programme (NICDP) — 11 industrial corridors anchored by NICDC.
• PM GatiShakti National Master Plan, 2021 — Multi-modal connectivity platform with GIS-based integration of 16 ministries.
• National Logistics Policy, 2022 — Targets reduction of logistics cost to single-digit % of GDP by 2030.
• Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Schemes, 2020–21 — 14 sectors; demand-side incentive for manufacturing.
• National Single Window System (NSWS), 2021 — One-stop digital platform for investor approvals.
• National Manufacturing Policy, 2011 — Original target of 25% manufacturing share of GDP.
• Companies Act, 2013 — Statutory basis for SPV incorporation under BHAVYA.
• Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act, 2005 — Earlier industrial cluster framework; under reform via the proposed DESH Bill.

Key Aspects of BHAVYA at a Glance

Domain	Detail
Nature of Scheme	Central Sector Scheme
Nodal Department	DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry
Project Management Agency	NICDC (National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation)
Total Outlay	₹33,660 crore
Timeline	Six years — FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32
Total Parks Targeted	100 industrial parks; first 50 via challenge mode
Financial Assistance (per acre)	Up to ₹1 crore per acre
External Infrastructure Funding	Up to 25% of cost
Execution Vehicle	Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) under the Companies Act, 2013
Minimum Land — Standard States	100 acres (contiguous, greenfield/eligible brownfield)
Minimum Land — Hilly / NE / UTs / Small States	25 acres
Maximum Macro-Cluster Size	Up to 1,000 acres
Mandatory Linkage	PM GatiShakti National Master Plan GIS layering
Oversight	National Level Steering Committee chaired by Secretary, DPIIT

India’s Position

India’s industrial infrastructure architecture is layered, with BHAVYA serving as the supply-side capstone:

• Manufacturing Targets: India aspires to be a $5 trillion economy with manufacturing at 25% of GDP and a $500 billion electronics manufacturing output by 2030.
• Demand-side Instruments: PLI Schemes across 14 sectors with outlay of ~₹1.97 lakh crore; Semiconductor Mission with ₹76,000 crore; National Green Hydrogen Mission (2023) at ₹19,744 crore.
• Supply-side Infrastructure: BHAVYA, NICDP corridors, Bharatmala (highways), Sagarmala (ports), Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFCs), UDAN (regional air connectivity), all integrated under PM GatiShakti, 2021.
• Ease of Doing Business: India ranks among the top investment destinations in UNCTAD’s World Investment Report; NSWS integrates approvals across 32+ central departments and 28+ states/UTs.
• FDI Architecture: 100% FDI under the automatic route in most manufacturing sectors; record FDI inflows in 2023–24; DPIIT is the nodal department.
• Trade Architecture: TEPA (India–EFTA, 2024) with $100 bn investment pledge, India–UAE CEPA (2022), India–Australia ECTA (2022), India–UK FTA (signed 2025), India–EU FTA (under negotiation) — all funnelling demand into BHAVYA parks.
• Logistics Reform: National Logistics Policy, 2022 targets logistics cost reduction to single-digit % of GDP by 2030; LEADS Index ranks state logistics performance.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ BHAVYA (Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna): Central Sector Scheme launched in 2026 to develop 100 plug-and-play industrial smart cities with an outlay of ₹33,660 crore over FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32.

▸ Central Sector Scheme: Schemes that are 100% funded by the Union Government and implemented by central agencies — distinct from Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) where costs are shared with states.

▸ DPIIT (Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade): Department under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry; renamed from DIPP in 2019; custodian of Make in India, Startup India, NSWS, and FDI policy.

▸ NICDC (National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation): Project Management Agency for India’s industrial corridors; renamed from DMICDC in 2020; oversees 11 industrial corridors including DMIC, CBIC, AKIC, EBIC.

▸ Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV): A separate legal entity incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 for a specific project, used to ring-fence assets, liabilities, and risks.

▸ PM GatiShakti National Master Plan (2021): A digital, GIS-based platform integrating 16 ministries for multi-modal logistics and infrastructure planning.

▸ National Logistics Policy, 2022: Aims to reduce logistics costs to single-digit % of GDP by 2030; introduces the Unified Logistics Interface Platform (ULIP) and LEADS Index.

▸ Make in India (2014): Government’s flagship initiative targeting 25 priority sectors to position India as a global manufacturing hub.

▸ Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (2020): Self-reliance framework structured around Five Ls — Land, Labour, Liquidity, Laws, Logistics.

▸ Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme: Outcome-based, 14-sector demand-side incentive with outlay of ~₹1.97 lakh crore, launched 2020–21.

▸ National Industrial Corridor Development Programme (NICDP): Programme anchoring 11 industrial corridors including DMIC, CBIC, AKIC, EBIC, HMIC.

▸ CETP (Common Effluent Treatment Plant): Shared infrastructure for collective treatment of industrial effluents to meet pollution norms.

▸ Brownfield vs Greenfield Project: Greenfield projects are built on entirely new sites; brownfield projects build on or expand existing industrial sites.

▸ Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Act, 2005: Earlier framework for export-oriented industrial enclaves; reform proposed via the DESH (Development of Enterprise and Service Hubs) Bill.

▸ National Manufacturing Policy, 2011: First comprehensive manufacturing policy; targeted 25% share of GDP and National Investment & Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs).

▸ National Single Window System (NSWS), 2021: Unified digital platform for investors to apply for clearances across 32+ central departments and 28+ states/UTs.

▸ China-Plus-One Strategy: Global supply-chain diversification trend by multinationals away from over-reliance on China, opening up opportunities for India, Vietnam, Mexico.

▸ Bharatmala Pariyojana (2017): Umbrella highway development programme targeting economic corridors, expressways, and border roads.

▸ Sagarmala Programme (2015): Flagship for port-led development, modernization, and coastal connectivity.

▸ Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFCs): Rail freight-only corridors; Eastern (Ludhiana–Dankuni) and Western (Dadri–JNPT, Mumbai) corridors anchor BHAVYA-region logistics.

▸ LARR Act, 2013: Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act — governs land acquisition for public purposes.

▸ Five Ls of Aatmanirbhar Bharat: Land, Labour, Liquidity, Laws, Logistics — the five drivers of India’s self-reliance push.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. With reference to the Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna (BHAVYA), consider the following:

(a) It is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme (b) It is a Central Sector Scheme (c) It is a State-led scheme with central advisory support (d) It is a public–private bilateral programme outside the Union Budget

Q2. The Nodal Department and the Project Management Agency for the BHAVYA scheme are, respectively:

(a) Ministry of Heavy Industries and HUDCO (b) DPIIT and NICDC (c) Ministry of MSME and SIDBI (d) NITI Aayog and Invest India

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the BHAVYA scheme:

1. It has a total outlay of ₹33,660 crore.
2. It will be implemented over six years, from FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32.
3. It targets the development of 100 industrial parks nationwide.
4. The first 50 parks will be selected through a challenge-based competitive framework.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q4. Under the BHAVYA scheme, the minimum contiguous land area required for industrial parks in hilly states, north-eastern states, Union Territories, and smaller states is:

(a) 100 acres (b) 50 acres (c) 25 acres (d) 10 acres

Q5. With reference to financial assistance under the BHAVYA scheme, consider the following statements:

1. Central financial assistance is provided up to ₹1 crore per acre.
2. The scheme funds up to 25% of the cost of external infrastructure.
3. Government support is routed as equity contribution through SPVs linked to state land transfers and project milestones.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q6. The PM GatiShakti National Master Plan, with which BHAVYA park layouts must be integrated, was launched in:

(a) 2019 (b) 2020 (c) 2021 (d) 2022

Q7. Consider the following statements regarding the National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation (NICDC):

1. It was earlier known as the Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation (DMICDC).
2. It currently oversees the development of 11 industrial corridors in India.
3. It functions under the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q8. The “Five Ls” under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat framework refer to:

(a) Land, Labour, Liquidity, Laws, Logistics (b) Land, Labour, Liberalization, Laws, Logistics (c) Land, Labour, Liquidity, Liberalization, Logistics (d) Land, Labour, Loans, Laws, Liberalization

Q9. Consider the following statements about India’s industrial infrastructure architecture:

1. The Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act was enacted in 2005.
2. The National Manufacturing Policy, 2011 targeted a 25% share of manufacturing in GDP.
3. The National Single Window System (NSWS) is operated by NITI Aayog.
4. The Dedicated Freight Corridors include the Eastern (Ludhiana–Dankuni) and Western (Dadri–JNPT) corridors.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 3 and 4 only

Q10. Match the following Indian initiatives with their year of launch:

Initiative	Year
A. Make in India	1. 2015
B. Sagarmala	2. 2022
C. PM GatiShakti National Master Plan	3. 2014
D. National Logistics Policy	4. 2021

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2 (b) A-1, B-3, C-4, D-2 (c) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4 (d) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (b) Central Sector Scheme. BHAVYA is a Central Sector Scheme, meaning it is 100% funded by the Union Government and implemented by central agencies (DPIIT/NICDC). Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS), in contrast, involve cost-sharing with states.

▸ Q2 → (b) DPIIT and NICDC. The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is the Nodal Department, while the National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation (NICDC) is the Project Management Agency.

▸ Q3 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. BHAVYA has an outlay of ₹33,660 crore over FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32, targets 100 industrial parks, with the first 50 selected through a challenge-based competitive framework.

▸ Q4 → (c) 25 acres. The scheme specifies a minimum of 100 acres in standard non-hilly states and 25 acres in hilly, north-eastern, Union Territory, and small states, with macro-clusters permitted up to 1,000 acres.

▸ Q5 → (d) 1, 2 and 3. All three statements are correct. The scheme provides up to ₹1 crore per acre, funds up to 25% of external infrastructure cost, and channels central support as equity contribution through SPVs linked to state land transfers and milestones.

▸ Q6 → (c) 2021. The PM GatiShakti National Master Plan was launched in October 2021 to integrate the infrastructure planning of 16 ministries on a single GIS-based digital platform.

▸ Q7 → (a) 1 and 2 only. NICDC was earlier known as DMICDC and was renamed in 2020; it oversees 11 industrial corridors. Statement 3 is wrong — NICDC functions under the DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, not the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.

▸ Q8 → (a) Land, Labour, Liquidity, Laws, Logistics. The Five Ls under Aatmanirbhar Bharat (2020) are Land, Labour, Liquidity, Laws, and Logistics.

▸ Q9 → (b) 1, 2 and 4 only. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong — the National Single Window System (NSWS) is operated by Invest India under DPIIT, not by NITI Aayog.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2. Make in India — 2014; Sagarmala — 2015; PM GatiShakti — 2021; National Logistics Policy — 2022.

4. Section 124A (Sedition Law)

Summary

The Supreme Court of India has clarified its landmark 2022 freeze on the colonial-era sedition law, ruling that lower courts may resume pending trials and appeals under Section 124A of the now-repealed Indian Penal Code (IPC) if the accused consents. In Kamran v. State of Madhya Pradesh (May 2026), a bench led by the Chief Justice of India modified the absolute abeyance ordered in S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India (May 2022) — recognizing that several jailed or convicted individuals were trapped in a legal limbo and unable to seek acquittal or closure.

Key dimensions of the development include:

• Section 124A — introduced into the IPC in 1870 via an amendment drafted by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen — has been structurally replaced by Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
• The BNS drops the word “sedition” and reframes the offence as “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India,” with an expanded actus reus covering secession, armed rebellion, separatist and subversive activities, and even financial means.
• The alternative prison term has been raised from the colonial three years to seven years, with life imprisonment as the upper limit — making the new provision structurally tougher than its predecessor.
• The 2026 ruling does not lift the freeze on fresh FIRs; it only allows consent-based revival of pending matters.
• The constitutional validity of Section 124A remains under reference to a larger bench for reconsidering the Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) ruling.

Background & Concept

What is Section 124A?

Section 124A of the IPC (now repealed) was a penal provision that criminalized sedition — defined as bringing or attempting to bring hatred, contempt, or disaffection toward the Government established by law in India through spoken or written words, signs, visible representations, or electronic means. It was a cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable offence, carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment or imprisonment up to three years, with or without fine.

Importantly, Section 124A was not part of the original 1860 IPC drafted by Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay; it was inserted in 1870 by an amendment drafted by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen — primarily as an instrument to crush dissent against colonial rule. The British Raj famously deployed it against Indian freedom fighters including Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1898, 1908) and Mahatma Gandhi (1922).

Evolution of Sedition Law in India

Year	Milestone
1860	Original Indian Penal Code drafted by Macaulay — no sedition clause
1870	Section 124A inserted via amendment by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen
1898	Bal Gangadhar Tilak convicted under Section 124A
1922	Mahatma Gandhi tried under Section 124A; famously called it the “prince among the political sections of the IPC designed to suppress liberty of the citizen”
1950	Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras and Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi — Supreme Court protects free speech
1951	First Constitutional Amendment — adds “public order” to Article 19(2)
1962	Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar — Section 124A upheld but read down; only acts with incitement to violence or public disorder punishable
2018	Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on sedition recommends re-examination
2022	S.G. Vombatkere v. UoI — Supreme Court orders absolute freeze on Section 124A
2023	Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) enacted (in force 1 July 2024) — IPC repealed
2026	Kamran v. State of MP — freeze modified; consent-based revival of pending matters

About the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

• One of three new criminal laws (alongside Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita replacing the CrPC, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replacing the Indian Evidence Act) that replaced the IPC, 1860.
• Came into force on 1 July 2024.
• Reduces 511 IPC sections to 358 sections, introduces new offences (e.g., organized crime, terrorism, mob lynching), and expands community service as punishment.
• Section 152 — “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” — replaces Section 124A.

Key Frameworks & Doctrines Referenced

• Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) — Constitution Bench; upheld Section 124A but read it down to apply only to acts involving incitement to violence or public disorder.
• S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India (May 2022) — Three-judge bench; placed Section 124A in complete abeyance.
• Kamran v. State of Madhya Pradesh (May 2026) — CJI-led bench; modified the 2022 freeze for consent-based revival of pending matters.
• Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras (1950) — Free speech can be restricted only on grounds in Article 19(2).
• Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi (1950) — Pre-publication censorship struck down.
• Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) — Struck down Section 66A of the IT Act for “chilling effect.”
• First Constitutional Amendment, 1951 — Added “public order” and other grounds to Article 19(2).
• Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(2) — Constitutional bedrock of the free speech vs. restriction balance.
• Law Commission of India, 279th Report (2023) — Recommended retaining sedition with safeguards.
• Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — Section 152 replaces and reframes sedition.

Section 124A IPC vs Section 152 BNS

Dimension	Section 124A IPC (1870)	Section 152 BNS (2023)
Nomenclature	Sedition	“Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India”
Word “Sedition”	Used	Dropped
Core Conduct	Hatred, contempt, disaffection toward Government	Secession, armed rebellion, separatist activities, subversive activities
Means	Words, signs, visible representations, electronic means	Words, signs, visible representations, electronic communication, financial means
Maximum Punishment	Life imprisonment + fine, OR up to 3 years	Life imprisonment + fine, OR up to 7 years + fine
Classification	Cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable	Cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable
Constitutional Test (1962)	Read down — only “incitement to violence or public disorder”	Yet to be tested
Current Status	Frozen (2022); pending matters revived on consent (2026)	In force from 1 July 2024

India’s Position

India’s free-speech architecture sits at the intersection of constitutional liberty and state security:

• Constitutional anchor: Article 19(1)(a) guarantees free speech; Article 19(2) permits reasonable restrictions on eight grounds — sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to an offence.
• Judicial benchmark: Kedar Nath Singh (1962) remains the lodestar; Shreya Singhal (2015), Puttaswamy (2017), Anuradha Bhasin (2020), and Vombatkere (2022) form the supporting matrix of free-speech jurisprudence.
• Statutory regime: BNS, BNSS, BSA (2023, in force 2024), UAPA, 1967, NSA, 1980, IT Act, 2000 (Section 69A), IT Rules, 2021, DPDP Act, 2023.
• International commitments: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948) Article 19; ICCPR, 1966 — India ratified in 1979.
• Law Commission reports: 267th Report (2017) on Hate Speech; 279th Report (2023) on Sedition — recommended retention with safeguards.
• Comparative position: UK abolished sedition (2009); Australia repealed sedition and replaced it with “urging violence” offences (2010); Singapore retains it; US has narrow incitement-only standard since Brandenburg (1969).
• Free-speech indices: India’s standing on indices like Reporters Without Borders’ Press Freedom Index and V-Dem Democracy Reports is a recurring subject of domestic and international debate.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ Section 124A IPC (1870): Now-repealed provision criminalizing sedition — bringing hatred, contempt, or disaffection toward the Government established by law. Inserted by an 1870 amendment, not part of the original 1860 IPC.

▸ Section 152 BNS (2023): Replacement for Section 124A — titled “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India”; criminalizes secession, armed rebellion, separatist and subversive activities.

▸ Sir James Fitzjames Stephen: British jurist who drafted the 1870 amendment inserting Section 124A; also drafted the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

▸ Lord Macaulay: Chairman of the First Law Commission of India (1834); drafted the original Indian Penal Code (1860) — which did not contain a sedition provision.

▸ Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023: Replaced the IPC, 1860; came into force on 1 July 2024; contains 358 sections covering substantive criminal law.

▸ Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023: Replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973.

▸ Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023: Replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

▸ Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962): Constitution Bench judgment that upheld Section 124A but read it down to apply only where acts involve incitement to violence or public disorder.

▸ S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India (May 2022): Supreme Court placed Section 124A in complete abeyance — freezing all pending trials, appeals, and fresh FIRs.

▸ Kamran v. State of Madhya Pradesh (May 2026): Modified the 2022 freeze, allowing consent-based revival of pending trials and appeals.

▸ Article 19(1)(a): Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and expression.

▸ Article 19(2): Permits “reasonable restrictions” on free speech on grounds of sovereignty, integrity, security, public order, friendly relations, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence.

▸ First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951: Added the grounds of “public order, friendly relations with foreign States, and incitement to an offence” to Article 19(2).

▸ Cognizable Offence: Offence in which a police officer can arrest the accused without a warrant.

▸ Non-Bailable Offence: Bail is not a matter of right; the accused must approach a court.

▸ Non-Compoundable Offence: Cannot be settled or compromised between the parties; only the State can prosecute.

▸ “Chilling Effect” Doctrine: The deterrent effect that vague or overbroad laws have on legitimate exercise of free speech.

▸ Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969): US Supreme Court ruling that established the “imminent lawless action” standard for incitement-based restrictions on speech.

▸ UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act), 1967: India’s principal anti-terror statute; 2019 amendment allows individuals to be designated as terrorists.

▸ NSA (National Security Act), 1980: Provides for preventive detention of up to 12 months without trial in the interest of national security.

▸ Law Commission of India, 279th Report (2023): Recommended retention of sedition with procedural safeguards including prior sanction.

▸ ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), 1966: UN treaty ratified by India in 1979; Article 19 protects free speech.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, dealing with sedition:

(a) Was part of the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860 by Lord Macaulay (b) Was introduced through an 1870 amendment drafted by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (c) Was inserted by the First Constitutional Amendment, 1951 (d) Was inserted through the IPC (Amendment) Act, 1898

Q2. Consider the following statements regarding the landmark judgment in Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962):

1. It was delivered by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.
2. It struck down Section 124A as unconstitutional.
3. It read down Section 124A to apply only where there is incitement to violence or public disorder.
4. It was the first judicial pronouncement on the constitutional validity of Section 124A.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 3 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q3. Section 124A of the IPC has been replaced by which provision of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?

(a) Section 150 (b) Section 152 (c) Section 153A (d) Section 295

Q4. The freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution is subject to “reasonable restrictions” under Article 19(2) on grounds including all of the following, EXCEPT:

(a) Public order (b) Sovereignty and integrity of India (c) Promotion of trade and commerce (d) Friendly relations with foreign States

Q5. Consider the following statements regarding the three new criminal laws of 2023:

1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
3. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
4. All three laws came into force on 1 July 2024.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q6. Which of the following grounds for restricting freedom of speech under Article 19(2) was added by the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951?

1. Public order
2. Friendly relations with foreign States
3. Incitement to an offence
4. Sovereignty and integrity of India

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q7. With reference to the offence of sedition (Section 124A IPC), consider the following statements:

1. It is a cognizable offence.
2. It is a bailable offence.
3. It is a non-compoundable offence.
4. The maximum punishment is life imprisonment with or without fine.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 3 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q8. The judgment in S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India (2022) is associated with:

(a) Striking down Section 124A of the IPC (b) Reading down Section 124A to require incitement to violence (c) Putting Section 124A in complete abeyance — freezing trials, appeals, and fresh FIRs (d) Declaring Section 124A constitutionally valid in its entirety

Q9. Consider the following statements about Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:

1. It explicitly retains the word “sedition” used in Section 124A IPC.
2. It criminalizes secession, armed rebellion, separatist and subversive activities.
3. It expressly includes the use of financial means among the modes of commission.
4. Its alternative term of imprisonment is up to seven years, higher than the three-year term under Section 124A.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q10. Match the following judicial pronouncements with their primary subject matter:

Case	Subject
A. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962)	1. Right to privacy as a fundamental right
B. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)	2. Internet shutdowns and free speech
C. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)	3. Sedition under Section 124A IPC
D. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020)	4. Section 66A of the IT Act

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2 (b) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2 (c) A-1, B-4, C-3, D-2 (d) A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (b) Section 124A was not part of the original IPC of 1860 drafted under Lord Macaulay’s Law Commission; it was introduced by an 1870 amendment, drafted by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, to suppress Indian nationalist dissent.

▸ Q2 → (b) 1, 3 and 4 only. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong — the Constitution Bench upheld Section 124A as constitutional, but read it down to require incitement to violence or public disorder.

▸ Q3 → (b) Section 152. Section 124A IPC has been replaced by Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, titled “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India.”

▸ Q4 → (c) Promotion of trade and commerce. Article 19(2) lists eight grounds — sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to an offence. “Promotion of trade and commerce” is not among them.

▸ Q5 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. The three new criminal laws — BNS, BNSS, BSA — replaced the IPC (1860), CrPC (1973), and Indian Evidence Act (1872) respectively, and came into force on 1 July 2024.

▸ Q6 → (a) 1, 2 and 3 only. The First Constitutional Amendment, 1951 added public order, friendly relations with foreign States, and incitement to an offence to Article 19(2). Sovereignty and integrity of India was added later by the Sixteenth Amendment Act, 1963.

▸ Q7 → (b) 1, 3 and 4 only. Statement 2 is wrong — Section 124A was classified as a non-bailable offence, not bailable. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct.

▸ Q8 → (c) In S.G. Vombatkere v. UoI (May 2022), a three-judge Supreme Court bench placed Section 124A in complete abeyance, freezing all pending trials, appeals, and fresh FIRs across India, while the law was under reconsideration.

▸ Q9 → (b) 2, 3 and 4 only. Statement 1 is wrong — the BNS deliberately drops the word “sedition” and rebrands the offence. Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct: Section 152 criminalizes secession, armed rebellion, separatist and subversive activities, expressly includes financial means, and raises the alternative imprisonment term from three to seven years.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2. Kedar Nath Singh (1962) → Sedition under Section 124A; Shreya Singhal (2015) → Section 66A of the IT Act; Puttaswamy (2017) → Right to privacy as a fundamental right; Anuradha Bhasin (2020) → Internet shutdowns and free speech.

5. The Conocarpus Plant — An Invasive Species Alert (2026)

Source: TH

Summary

Ecologists have raised urgent alarms as recent highway development projects across Tamil Nadu continue to plant the Conocarpus tree along road medians, traffic islands, and avenue strips, reviving a debate that had already pushed states such as Gujarat (2023) and Telangana (2023) to ban its cultivation. Conocarpus erectus — commonly known as Buttonwood, Button Mangrove, or Green/Silver Buttonwood — is a hardy mangrove-family shrub or tree of the Combretaceae family, native to the tropical and subtropical shorelines of the Americas and West Africa, that has spread rapidly through Indian urban landscapes due to its fast growth, evergreen foliage, and tolerance of high temperatures and brackish water.

Key dimensions of the present concern include:

• Public health impact — heavy pollen release in winter triggers allergies, cough, asthma, and other respiratory illnesses, especially among children and the elderly.
• Infrastructure damage — its aggressive root system cracks pavements, ruptures water pipelines, disrupts underground telecom cables, and clogs sewage systems.
• Groundwater depletion — dense plantations consume disproportionate quantities of subsoil moisture, drying nearby soils and lowering water tables.
• Biodiversity loss — promotes monoculture, suppresses native flora, and disturbs soil microbial ecosystems, fitting the definition of an Invasive Alien Species (IAS).
• Regulatory inconsistency — while certain state governments have banned cultivation, others continue to plant it under avenue-greening, highway-beautification, and smart-city programmes.

Background & Concept

What is Conocarpus?

Conocarpus erectus is a hardy, salt-tolerant, mangrove-associate shrub or tree of the Combretaceae family, native to the tropical and subtropical shorelines of the Americas and West Africa — stretching from South Florida and Mexico down to Peru and Brazil. It is botanically a halophyte (salt-tolerant plant) with specialized salt glands on its leaves that filter excess salinity, allowing it to thrive in brackish coastal soils. Imported into India by civic authorities and highway planners for its rapid growth, evergreen sleek foliage, drought tolerance, and visual uniformity, it has been widely used in median plantations, traffic islands, gated colonies, and corporate landscaping.

Key Botanical Characteristics

Attribute	Detail
Scientific Name	Conocarpus erectus
Common Names	Buttonwood, Button Mangrove, Green/Silver Buttonwood
Family	Combretaceae
Native Range	Americas (S. Florida → Peru/Brazil), West Africa
Growth Form	Dense, multi-trunked shrub (1–4 m) → mature tree up to 20 m, trunk diameter ~1 m
Varieties	C. e. var. erectus (Green Buttonwood); C. e. var. sericeus (Silver Buttonwood — velvety silver-hairs, prized in landscaping)
Bark	Thick, scaly, gray-to-brown
Twigs	Highly brittle; distinctively angled or narrowly winged in cross-section
Leaves	Alternate, simple, oblong, 2–7 cm; two salt glands at the base of each leaf
Flowers	Small, petal-less, button-like (5–8 mm); in panicles of 35–56
Fruit	Red-to-brown, scaly cone-like structures (5–15 mm); two-winged seeds
Seed Dispersal	Burst-and-float — uses water currents for geographical dispersal
Tolerance	High salinity, brackish water, drought, heat

Why Conocarpus is a Problem

• Allergenic Pollen Load: Heavy winter pollen has been clinically linked to spikes in rhinitis, asthma, conjunctivitis, and dermatitis in cities with dense plantations.
• Aggressive Root System: Roots travel horizontally and deeply in search of moisture, cracking concrete, rupturing pipes, and undermining building foundations.
• High Evapo-transpiration: Mature trees draw large volumes of groundwater, exacerbating urban water stress.
• Allelopathy and Monoculture: Believed to suppress germination of native species in its root zone; promotes single-species stands with low faunal value — birds, pollinators, and herbivores generally avoid it.
• Fire Risk: Brittle, oil-rich twigs and dry leaf litter raise urban fire-spread risk in summer.
• No Pollinator Reward: Petal-less flowers offer little to native bees, butterflies, and birds — a stark contrast to native Neem (Azadirachta indica), Banyan (Ficus benghalensis), Pongamia pinnata, Tamarindus indica, or Albizia lebbeck.

About Invasive Alien Species (IAS)

• IUCN Definition: An alien species (introduced outside its natural past or present distribution) that becomes established and causes ecological, economic, or human-health damage is termed an Invasive Alien Species.
• The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 1992) lists IAS as one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, alongside land-use change, overexploitation, pollution, and climate change.
• The IPBES Global Assessment (2019) and the IPBES Invasive Alien Species Assessment (2023) flagged IAS as causing over US $423 billion in annual global damages.
• Common IAS in India: Lantana camara, Parthenium hysterophorus (Congress Grass), Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati Babul), Mikania micrantha, Mimosa diplotricha, Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), Senna spectabilis, African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus).

Key Frameworks & Provisions Referenced

• Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Amended 2023) — India’s anchor legislation on biological resources, access, and benefit sharing.
• National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), 2003 — Statutory body in Chennai; regulates access to biological resources.
• State Biodiversity Boards and Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs) — Three-tier institutional structure for biodiversity governance.
• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 1992 — India ratified in 1994; framework treaty on biodiversity.
• Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), 2022 — Adopted at CBD COP15; Target 6 seeks to reduce by 50% the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species by 2030.
• Nagoya Protocol, 2010 — On access and benefit-sharing under the CBD.
• Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 2000 — Regulates trans-boundary movement of living modified organisms.
• Forest Conservation Act, 1980 (Amended 2023) — Regulates change of land use of forest land.
• Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 — Umbrella environmental law.
• CITES (1973) — International convention on trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora.
• State Bans on Conocarpus — Gujarat (2023) and Telangana (2023) explicitly prohibited its plantation; Tamil Nadu Forest Department issued advisories.
• National Mission for a Green India (GIM), 2014 — Targets afforestation and biodiversity-rich green cover.
• Nagar Van Yojana, 2020 — Promotes city forests with native species.

Key Aspects of the Conocarpus Controversy

Domain	Impact
Public Health	Pollen-driven respiratory illnesses, allergies, asthma
Urban Infrastructure	Pavement cracking, pipe rupture, cable damage, sewer blockage
Hydrology	Groundwater depletion; aggressive subsurface water uptake
Biodiversity	Monoculture stands; suppression of native flora; low faunal value
Soil	Disrupts native soil microbial ecosystems
Fire Risk	Brittle, oil-rich twigs raise urban fire-spread risk
Regulatory Status	Banned in Gujarat (2023), Telangana (2023); advisory in Tamil Nadu (2026)
Continuing Spread	Highway medians, smart-city avenues, gated colonies, corporate parks

India’s Position

India’s biodiversity governance architecture is layered and aligned with international commitments:

• Constitutional anchor: Article 48A (Directive Principle — State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife) and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duty of every citizen to protect the natural environment).
• Statutory framework: Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Amended 2023), Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 (Amended 2023), Environment Protection Act, 1986, Plant Quarantine Order, 2003.
• Institutional architecture: National Biodiversity Authority (NBA, Chennai), State Biodiversity Boards, Biodiversity Management Committees at the local level; Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE).
• International commitments: CBD (1992) and the Kunming–Montreal GBF (2022), Nagoya Protocol (2010), Cartagena Protocol (2000), CITES (1973), Ramsar Convention (1971), CMS (Bonn Convention, 1979).
• Programmatic initiatives: National Mission for a Green India (GIM, 2014), Nagar Van Yojana (2020), Green Highways (Plantation, Transplantation, Beautification & Maintenance) Policy, 2015, Aravalli Green Wall Project, 2023, MISHTI (Mangrove Initiative for Shoreline Habitats & Tangible Incomes, 2023).
• Research base: ICAR National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), Centre for Invasive Species Studies, ICAR, Wildlife Institute of India (WII, Dehradun), Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON).
• Climate-biodiversity linkages: India’s afforestation drives — including its NDC pledge of an additional carbon sink of 2.5–3 billion tonnes of CO₂-equivalent through forest and tree cover by 2030 — are increasingly being assessed for native-species share.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ Conocarpus erectus: A salt-tolerant mangrove-associate shrub/tree of the Combretaceae family, native to the Americas and West Africa; introduced into India for landscaping.

▸ Buttonwood / Button Mangrove: Common names for Conocarpus erectus; refer to its small, button-like, petal-less flowers.

▸ Combretaceae: Plant family that also includes Indian natives like Terminalia arjuna (Arjuna), Terminalia bellirica (Bahera), Terminalia chebula (Haritaki).

▸ Halophyte: A plant that grows in salty or brackish conditions; equipped with adaptations such as salt glands, succulence, or salt exclusion.

▸ Salt Glands: Specialized structures on the leaves of halophytes that excrete excess salt absorbed by the roots.

▸ Invasive Alien Species (IAS): A non-native species whose introduction and spread threatens ecosystems, habitats, or other species, with negative environmental, economic, or health impacts.

▸ Alien Species: A species introduced outside its natural past or present distribution, regardless of whether it becomes invasive.

▸ Monoculture: Cultivation of a single species over a large area, leading to reduced biodiversity and increased vulnerability to pests and diseases.

▸ Allelopathy: The chemical inhibition of one plant by another due to the release of toxic substances into the soil.

▸ Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Amended 2023): India’s anchor legislation on biodiversity; established the NBA, SBBs, and BMCs; the 2023 amendment streamlined approvals and decriminalized certain offences.

▸ National Biodiversity Authority (NBA): Statutory body established in 2003 at Chennai under the BD Act, 2002.

▸ Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs): Local bodies under the BD Act, 2002 responsible for preparing People’s Biodiversity Registers (PBRs).

▸ Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 1992: International treaty opened for signature at the Rio Earth Summit, 1992; India ratified in 1994.

▸ Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), 2022: Adopted at CBD COP15; Target 6 seeks to reduce introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species by 50% by 2030.

▸ IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services): Independent body that conducts assessments; published a dedicated IAS Assessment in 2023.

▸ Common Invasive Plants in India: Lantana camara, Parthenium hysterophorus, Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati Babul), Mikania micrantha, Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth), Senna spectabilis.

▸ Green Highways Policy, 2015: Mandates 1% of total project cost in National Highway projects to be earmarked for plantations.

▸ Nagar Van Yojana, 2020: Scheme of the MoEF&CC for development of urban forests on city outskirts.

▸ MISHTI (Mangrove Initiative for Shoreline Habitats & Tangible Incomes), 2023: Launched to restore and develop mangroves along India’s coastline.

▸ Botanical Survey of India (BSI): Plant taxonomy and biodiversity research body, headquartered in Kolkata; founded in 1890.

▸ People’s Biodiversity Register (PBR): Document maintained by BMCs recording local biological resources and traditional knowledge.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. The Conocarpus tree (Conocarpus erectus) belongs to which botanical family?

(a) Fabaceae (b) Combretaceae (c) Myrtaceae (d) Rhizophoraceae

Q2. Consider the following statements about Conocarpus erectus:

1. It is native to the tropical and subtropical shorelines of the Americas and West Africa.
2. It is a halophyte equipped with salt glands at the base of its leaves.
3. It is a deciduous tree that sheds all its leaves during winter.
4. Its fruits use water currents for geographical dispersal.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 3 and 4 only

Q3. Which of the following Indian states have explicitly banned the plantation of Conocarpus?

1. Gujarat
2. Telangana
3. Madhya Pradesh
4. Kerala

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1, 2 and 3 only (c) 2 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q4. Consider the following statements regarding the Biological Diversity Act, 2002:

1. It established the National Biodiversity Authority headquartered in Chennai.
2. It mandates the constitution of State Biodiversity Boards and Biodiversity Management Committees.
3. The Act was significantly amended in 2023.
4. It is the statutory expression of India’s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q5. Target 6 of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022) relates to:

(a) Restoring 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030 (b) Reducing the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species (c) Doubling global financial flows for biodiversity by 2030 (d) Conserving 30% of land and seas by 2030

Q6. Consider the following common invasive alien plant species in India:

1. Lantana camara
2. Parthenium hysterophorus
3. Prosopis juliflora
4. Mikania micrantha

Which of the above are correctly identified as invasive alien species in India?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q7. Which of the following correctly defines a “halophyte”?

(a) A plant that lives only at high altitudes (b) A plant that thrives in salty or brackish conditions (c) A plant that grows in fresh water (d) A plant that completes its life cycle in less than a year

Q8. Consider the following statements about the Green Highways Policy, 2015:

1. It mandates that 1% of the total project cost in National Highway projects be earmarked for plantations.
2. It is implemented by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
3. It encourages community participation in highway plantation drives.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q9. Which of the following native Indian tree species belong to the same family (Combretaceae) as Conocarpus?

1. Terminalia arjuna (Arjuna)
2. Terminalia bellirica (Bahera)
3. Azadirachta indica (Neem)
4. Terminalia chebula (Haritaki)

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q10. Match the following Indian initiatives with their primary focus:

Initiative	Focus
A. MISHTI	1. Urban forests on city outskirts
B. Nagar Van Yojana	2. Mangrove restoration along coastlines
C. Aravalli Green Wall Project	3. Carbon sink target of 2.5–3 billion tonnes CO₂-eq
D. Green India Mission	4. Combating land degradation and desertification in the Aravalli region

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3 (b) A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3 (c) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3 (d) A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (b) Combretaceae. Conocarpus erectus belongs to the Combretaceae family, which also includes Indian natives such as Terminalia arjuna (Arjuna), Terminalia bellirica (Bahera), and Terminalia chebula (Haritaki).

▸ Q2 → (b) 1, 2 and 4 only. Statement 3 is wrong — Conocarpus is evergreen, not deciduous; that is precisely why landscapers favoured it. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct: it is native to coastal Americas and West Africa, has salt glands on the leaf base, and its fruits use water currents for dispersal.

▸ Q3 → (a) 1 and 2 only. Gujarat (2023) and Telangana (2023) have explicitly banned the plantation of Conocarpus, citing public health and environmental concerns. Madhya Pradesh and Kerala have not issued a comparable statewide ban; Tamil Nadu is currently at the advisory stage.

▸ Q4 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. The NBA is headquartered in Chennai, the Act mandates the three-tier (NBA–SBB–BMC) structure, was amended in 2023, and operationalises India’s CBD commitments.

▸ Q5 → (b) Target 6 of the Kunming–Montreal GBF, 2022 specifically targets a 50% reduction in the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species by 2030. Restoration of 30% degraded ecosystems is Target 2, doubling biodiversity finance is Target 19, and 30×30 conservation is Target 3.

▸ Q6 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four — Lantana camara, Parthenium hysterophorus, Prosopis juliflora, and Mikania micrantha — are well-documented invasive alien plant species in India.

▸ Q7 → (b) A halophyte is a plant adapted to salty or brackish conditions. Common halophytes include mangroves, Salicornia, and Conocarpus. High-altitude plants are alpine/orophytes; freshwater plants are hydrophytes; short-life-cycle plants are annuals.

▸ Q8 → (c) 1 and 3 only. Statement 2 is wrong — the Green Highways Policy, 2015 is implemented by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH), not the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Statements 1 and 3 are correct.

▸ Q9 → (b) 1, 2 and 4 only. Terminalia arjuna, T. bellirica, and T. chebula all belong to the Combretaceae family, alongside Conocarpus. Azadirachta indica (Neem) belongs to the Meliaceae family.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3. MISHTI (2023) → mangrove restoration; Nagar Van Yojana (2020) → urban forests; Aravalli Green Wall Project (2023) → combating land degradation in the Aravallis; Green India Mission → carbon sink of 2.5–3 billion tonnes CO₂-eq (under India’s NDCs).

6. Sample Registration System (SRS) Statistical Report 2024

Source: TH

Summary

The Sample Registration System (SRS) Statistical Report 2024, released by the Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI) under the Ministry of Home Affairs, has provided incontrovertible proof that India’s pace of population growth is decisively slowing — a generational inflection that closes one demographic era and opens another. India’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has dropped to 1.9, falling below the replacement level of 2.1, while the Crude Birth Rate (CBR) has declined from 21 (2014) to 18.3 (2024) and the Crude Death Rate (CDR) has marginally eased from 6.7 to 6.4.

Key takeaways from SRS 2024 include:

• Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) has fallen sharply from 39 to 24 per 1,000 live births over the past decade.
• Life expectancy at birth has risen to 72 years, narrowing the gap with the global average.
• Median age stands at 29.2 years — far younger than China (40.2) and most of Europe — keeping India’s demographic dividend window open till around 2055.
• Youth aged 15–29 number 370–380 million (~27%); over 65% of Indians are under 35.
• South–North divergence persists — Kerala (TFR ~1.5, IMR 8), Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh lead; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan lag.
• Rural indicators continue to trail urban, with structural gaps in maternal, child, and primary healthcare.

The report effectively retires the old “population explosion” framing of Indian policy and reframes the debate around population ageing, sex ratio, internal migration, the demographic dividend, and intergenerational fiscal stress — directly informing the National Population Policy, Mission Parivar Vikas, the Census exercise, and India’s pursuit of SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by 2030.

Background & Concept

What is the Sample Registration System (SRS)?

The Sample Registration System is a large-scale, nationally representative demographic survey conducted by the Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI) to generate reliable annual estimates of fertility, mortality, and other vital indicators at the national, state, and rural–urban levels. It is India’s most authoritative source of inter-censal data on births and deaths.

• Launch: Initiated on a pilot basis in 1964–65; became fully operational nationwide in 1969–70.
• Methodology: Uses a unique Dual Record System (DRS) — independent continuous enumeration of births and deaths by a part-time enumerator at the village/urban-block level, and half-yearly retrospective surveys by a full-time supervisor; discrepancies are reconciled to derive unbiased estimates.
• Coverage: Around 8,800+ sample units covering a population of roughly 84 lakh across the country.
• Publication: Annual SRS Statistical Report and periodic SRS-based Abridged Life Tables.

Key SRS Indicators — 2014 vs 2024

Indicator	2014	2024	Status
Total Fertility Rate (TFR)	Higher	1.9	Below replacement level of 2.1
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) (per 1,000)	21	18.3	Down
Crude Death Rate (CDR) (per 1,000)	6.7	6.4	Marginally down
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) (per 1,000 live births)	39	24	Down sharply
Life expectancy at birth (years)	Lower	72	Up

India’s Youth Demographics (2026)

• Median age: 29.2 years (vs China: 40.2, Japan ~49, Germany ~46, US ~38).
• Youth aged 15–29: 370–380 million — roughly 27% of the population.
• Below 35 years: over 65% of the total population.
• India is the world’s most populous country (overtook China in 2023, per UN estimates).
• The demographic dividend window for India is widely placed at ~2018 to ~2055.

Drivers of the SRS 2024 Trends

Drivers of falling fertility:

• Rapid urbanization.
• Significant gains in female education and literacy.
• Wider access to contraception and family-planning services.
• Smaller-family preferences linked to rising costs of child-rearing and aspirational consumption.
• Delayed marriage and delayed childbearing.

Drivers of falling mortality:

• Improved healthcare access via Ayushman Bharat–PMJAY and Health and Wellness Centres.
• Strengthened maternal–child health programmes under the National Health Mission (NHM).
• Higher institutional delivery rates under Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) and JSSK.
• Universal immunization coverage via Mission Indradhanush and the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).
• Better nutrition (POSHAN Abhiyaan), sanitation (Swachh Bharat Mission), and access to safe drinking water (Jal Jeevan Mission).

About the Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI)

• Established in 1961, ORGI functions under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
• Mandated to conduct the Census of India (every 10 years since 1872; last completed in 2011; the 2021 Census has been postponed).
• Implements the Sample Registration System (SRS), the Civil Registration System (CRS) under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (amended 2023), and prepares the National Population Register (NPR).
• Headed by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India.

Key Frameworks & Schemes Referenced

• National Population Policy, 2000 — Set the target of replacement-level TFR; institutional architecture for population stabilisation.
• 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 — Moved “Population Control and Family Planning” from the State List to the Concurrent List.
• Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (Amended 2023) — Statutory basis for the Civil Registration System (CRS); the 2023 amendment digitised CRS and made the birth certificate a single document for school admissions, driving licences, voter rolls, etc.
• Mission Parivar Vikas (2016) — Targeted family-planning interventions in 146 high-TFR districts across 7 high-focus states.
• Jansankhya Sthirta Kosh (JSK) — Autonomous society of the MoHFW for population stabilisation activities.
• Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (RMNCH+A) strategy.
• National Family Health Survey (NFHS) — Quintennial survey by IIPS Mumbai under MoHFW; NFHS-5 (2019–21) reported a national TFR of 2.0.
• Ayushman Bharat (2018) — Health and Wellness Centres + Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) with ₹5 lakh annual cover.
• Janani Suraksha Yojana (2005), JSSK (2011), Surakshit Matritva Aashwasan (SUMAN, 2019) — Maternal health schemes.
• POSHAN Abhiyaan (2018), PM POSHAN (2021) — Nutrition flagship programmes.
• Swachh Bharat Mission (2014), Jal Jeevan Mission (2019) — Sanitation and water schemes.
• Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG-3) — Targets include U5MR ≤ 25/1,000, NMR ≤ 12/1,000, and MMR ≤ 70/100,000 by 2030.

Key Outcomes Flagged by SRS 2024

Domain	Outcome
Fertility	TFR at 1.9 — below replacement level of 2.1
Births	CBR declined from 21 (2014) to 18.3 (2024)
Mortality	CDR eased from 6.7 to 6.4; IMR fell from 39 to 24
Longevity	Life expectancy rose to 72 years
Youth Profile	Median age 29.2; 65%+ population under 35
South–North Divide	Kerala TFR ~1.5, IMR 8; Bihar/UP/MP/Rajasthan well above national IMR of 24
Rural–Urban Gap	Rural lagging on most maternal-child indicators
Ageing Signal	Onset of population ageing — 60+ population set to expand sharply

India’s Position

India’s population governance is anchored in a layered constitutional, statutory, and programmatic architecture:

• Constitutional anchor: 42nd Amendment, 1976 placed “Population Control and Family Planning” under the Concurrent List (Entry 20A). Article 47 (DPSP) directs the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living.
• Statutory framework: Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (Amended 2023); PCPNDT Act, 1994; Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971 (Amended 2021); Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
• Policy framework: National Population Policy, 2000; National Health Policy, 2017; National Education Policy, 2020.
• Institutional architecture: Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI), MoHFW, NITI Aayog, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS, Mumbai), National Commission on Population (NCP, 2000), Jansankhya Sthirta Kosh (JSK).
• Data ecosystem: Census of India (1872 onwards), SRS (1969-70 onwards), NFHS (1992 onwards), PLFS (2017 onwards), Civil Registration System (CRS), National Population Register (NPR), Annual Health Survey (AHS, 2010–13), and global counterparts like the UN World Population Prospects and the UNFPA State of World Population Report.
• Historic firsts: India was the first country in the world to launch a national family-planning programme (1952).
• International alignment: SDG-3 (Good Health), SDG-5 (Gender Equality), SDG-1 (No Poverty), ICPD Programme of Action, 1994 (Cairo), Beijing Declaration, 1995.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ Sample Registration System (SRS): Large-scale demographic survey by ORGI, operational since 1969–70, providing annual estimates of fertility and mortality indicators using a Dual Record System (DRS).

▸ Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI): Established 1961; under the Ministry of Home Affairs; conducts Census, SRS, CRS, and NPR. Headed by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner.

▸ Total Fertility Rate (TFR): The average number of children a woman is expected to bear over her reproductive lifetime (15–49 years), assuming current age-specific fertility rates.

▸ Replacement-Level Fertility: The TFR at which a population exactly replaces itself from one generation to the next; pegged at ~2.1 for most countries (slightly higher than 2.0 to account for child mortality and sex ratio at birth).

▸ Crude Birth Rate (CBR): Number of live births per 1,000 mid-year population in a given year.

▸ Crude Death Rate (CDR): Number of deaths per 1,000 mid-year population in a given year.

▸ Infant Mortality Rate (IMR): Number of deaths of infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births.

▸ Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR): Deaths within the first 28 days of life per 1,000 live births.

▸ Under-Five Mortality Rate (U5MR): Deaths of children under five years per 1,000 live births.

▸ Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): Number of maternal deaths per 1,00,000 live births.

▸ Life Expectancy at Birth: Average number of years a newborn is expected to live if prevailing mortality patterns continue.

▸ Demographic Dividend: The economic growth potential resulting from a higher share of working-age population relative to dependants; India’s window is approximately 2018–2055.

▸ Demographic Transition Theory: Framework describing the shift from high fertility–high mortality to low fertility–low mortality, typically through four/five stages.

▸ Civil Registration System (CRS): Continuous, mandatory, statutory recording of births and deaths under the RBD Act, 1969 (Amended 2023).

▸ National Population Register (NPR): A register of usual residents of India prepared at local, sub-district, district, state, and national levels under the Citizenship Act, 1955 and Citizenship Rules, 2003.

▸ National Family Health Survey (NFHS): Quintennial demographic and health survey by IIPS Mumbai under the MoHFW; NFHS-5 (2019–21) reported a national TFR of 2.0.

▸ Empowered Action Group (EAG) States: Eight states with persistent demographic and health lags — Bihar, UP, MP, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and Uttarakhand.

▸ 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976: Inserted Entry 20A — “Population Control and Family Planning” into the Concurrent List.

▸ National Population Policy, 2000: Set the long-term objective of a stable population by 2045 and replacement-level TFR by 2010.

▸ PCPNDT Act, 1994: Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act — prohibits sex selection and regulates prenatal diagnostic techniques.

▸ Mission Parivar Vikas (2016): Targeted family-planning intervention in 146 high-TFR districts of 7 high-focus states.

▸ Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), 2005: Conditional cash transfer scheme under NHM to promote institutional deliveries.

▸ ICPD Programme of Action, 1994 (Cairo): International Conference on Population and Development that shifted focus from demographic targets to reproductive rights and women’s empowerment.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. The Sample Registration System (SRS) in India is published by:

(a) National Statistical Office (NSO) (b) International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai (c) Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI), Ministry of Home Affairs (d) Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

Q2. Consider the following statements regarding the SRS Statistical Report 2024:

1. India’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has dropped to 1.9, below the replacement level of 2.1.
2. The Crude Birth Rate (CBR) has declined from 21 in 2014 to 18.3 in 2024.
3. The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) has declined from 39 to 24 per 1,000 live births.
4. Life expectancy at birth has risen to 72 years.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q3. Replacement-level fertility for most countries, including India, is conventionally pegged at:

(a) 1.5 (b) 1.9 (c) 2.1 (d) 2.5

Q4. The subject of “Population Control and Family Planning” was placed in the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution by which Amendment?

(a) 24th Amendment, 1971 (b) 42nd Amendment, 1976 (c) 44th Amendment, 1978 (d) 73rd Amendment, 1992

Q5. Consider the following statements regarding India’s demographic profile in 2026:

1. India’s median age is approximately 29.2 years.
2. Youth aged 15–29 number around 370–380 million.
3. Over 65% of India’s population is below the age of 35.
4. India’s demographic dividend window is widely placed at 2018–2055.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q6. Which of the following is/are correctly matched?

1. Total Fertility Rate (TFR) — Number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15–49.
2. Crude Birth Rate (CBR) — Number of live births per 1,000 mid-year population.
3. Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) — Number of deaths of infants under one year per 1,000 live births.

Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q7. The Sample Registration System (SRS) in India:

(a) Was launched in 1991 to coincide with economic liberalisation (b) Was initiated on a pilot basis in 1964–65 and became fully operational in 1969–70 (c) Replaces the decennial Census of India (d) Is conducted jointly by the World Bank and the Government of India

Q8. Mission Parivar Vikas (2016) is targeted at:

(a) Promoting agricultural family enterprises (b) Family-planning interventions in 146 high-TFR districts of 7 high-focus states (c) Promoting joint-family living through tax incentives (d) Crop diversification in family-owned farms

Q9. Consider the following statements about the Empowered Action Group (EAG) States:

1. They include Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
2. They were identified for their persistent lag in demographic and health indicators.
3. Kerala and Tamil Nadu are included among the EAG states.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Q10. Match the following demographic indicators with their definitions:

Indicator	Definition
A. CBR	1. Average number of children a woman is expected to bear in her lifetime
B. CDR	2. Deaths of infants under one year per 1,000 live births
C. TFR	3. Number of live births per 1,000 mid-year population
D. IMR	4. Number of deaths per 1,000 mid-year population

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2 (b) A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4 (c) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2 (d) A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (c) Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI), Ministry of Home Affairs. SRS is conducted and published by ORGI under the MHA. NSO publishes PLFS and national accounts; IIPS conducts the NFHS under MoHFW.

▸ Q2 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. TFR is 1.9 (below 2.1), CBR has fallen from 21 to 18.3, IMR from 39 to 24, and life expectancy is at 72 years.

▸ Q3 → (c) 2.1. Replacement-level fertility is conventionally pegged at ~2.1 — slightly above 2.0 to compensate for child mortality and the natural sex ratio at birth (slightly more boys than girls).

▸ Q4 → (b) 42nd Amendment, 1976. The 42nd Amendment inserted Entry 20A — “Population Control and Family Planning” into the Concurrent List, enabling both Union and States to legislate on the subject.

▸ Q5 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. India’s median age is 29.2 years; 15–29 cohort is 370–380 million; over 65% are under 35; and the demographic dividend window is ~2018–2055.

▸ Q6 → (b) 2 and 3 only. Pair 1 is wrong — TFR is the average number of children a woman is expected to bear over her reproductive lifetime (15–49 years) under prevailing fertility rates, not the number of live births per 1,000 women. Pairs 2 and 3 are correct.

▸ Q7 → (b) Initiated on a pilot basis in 1964–65 and became fully operational in 1969–70. SRS is a continuous, sample-based demographic survey — it complements but does not replace the decennial Census, and is a wholly domestic exercise by ORGI.

▸ Q8 → (b) Mission Parivar Vikas, launched by the MoHFW in 2016, targets family-planning interventions in 146 high-TFR districts spread across 7 high-focus states with persistent fertility lag.

▸ Q9 → (a) 1 and 2 only. Statement 3 is wrong — Kerala and Tamil Nadu are NOT EAG states; in fact, they are leaders in demographic transition. The eight EAG states are Bihar, UP, MP, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and Uttarakhand.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2. CBR → live births per 1,000 mid-year population; CDR → deaths per 1,000 mid-year population; TFR → average number of children a woman bears in her lifetime; IMR → infant deaths under one year per 1,000 live births.

Banking and Finance News

1. RBI Tightens Governance Norms for Urban Cooperative Bank (UCB)

Summary

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has tightened governance norms for directors of Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) through the “Reserve Bank of India (Urban Co-operative Banks, Governance) Amendment Directions, 2026”, which have come into force with immediate effect. The central provisions are clear and consequential: an individual cannot serve as a director continuously for more than 10 years on the board of a UCB, and reappointment is permitted only after a compulsory three-year cooling-off period. During this cooling-off period, the director cannot be associated with the UCB in any capacity other than as a member or customer — explicitly barring engagement as consultant, advisor, or committee member.

Key dimensions of the amendment include:

• A cumulative tenure cap of 10 years for any individual director, plugging the loophole of brief resignations and quick re-elections.
• A mandatory three-year cooling-off period with strictly limited permissible association.
• Builds on RBI’s expanded supervisory powers under the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 — including the authority to supersede UCB boards, appoint administrators, and approve CEO appointments under fit-and-proper criteria.
• Reinforces the four-tier regulatory architecture recommended by the N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee on UCBs (2021) and operationalised by RBI thereafter.
• Comes against the backdrop of the PMC Bank crisis (2019) and a string of UCB failures that exposed concentrated boardroom power, opaque related-party lending, and weak audit governance.

The move marks a decisive step in aligning UCBs with commercial-bank governance standards while preserving their cooperative character — even as questions persist around the dual control by the RBI and the Registrars of Cooperative Societies (State / Multi-State), and the institutional role of the newly created Ministry of Cooperation (2021).

Background & Concept

What are Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs)?

Urban Cooperative Banks are cooperative credit institutions that operate in urban and semi-urban areas, organised on cooperative principles (one member, one vote; service over profit) and providing banking services largely to MSMEs, small traders, salaried workers, and self-employed professionals in their local catchments. UCBs are registered under either a State Cooperative Societies Act or the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, and licensed under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (as applicable to cooperative societies).

• Number: Around 1,500 UCBs in India (down from over 1,900 a decade ago, due to mergers and licence cancellations).
• Categories: Scheduled vs Non-Scheduled UCBs; Single-State vs Multi-State UCBs.
• Total deposits and advances: Several lakh crore rupees — a small share of total banking assets, but a critical credit channel for the bottom of the urban pyramid.

Dual Control over Cooperative Banks

Historically, UCBs operated under dual regulation:

Aspect	Regulator
Banking functions (licensing, prudential norms, liquidity, capital adequacy)	Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
Managerial functions (registration, elections, audit, amalgamation, winding-up)	Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS) for state-level UCBs; Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies (CRCS) for multi-state UCBs

The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 substantially strengthened RBI’s authority over cooperative banks, narrowing — though not eliminating — the dual-control regime.

Why the 2026 Amendment Was Needed

• The RBI observed a pattern of directors resigning briefly and then getting re-elected or co-opted back within a short period.
• This practice allowed certain directors to circumvent statutory tenure ceilings and effectively continue indefinitely, concentrating boardroom power.
• The amendment plugs the loophole by enforcing both a cumulative tenure cap and a meaningful cooling-off period.
• Builds on lessons from the PMC Bank (Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative Bank) crisis, 2019, where boardroom capture, related-party lending, and weak internal controls led to losses of over ₹6,500 crore.

Wider UCB Regulatory Architecture

• Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (as amended in 2020) — Core statute governing UCBs.
• Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 — Empowered RBI to:
  • Supersede the board of a UCB in the public interest.
  • Appoint administrators.
  • Approve CEO appointments subject to fit-and-proper criteria.
  • Supervise management in line with commercial-bank standards.
  • Mandate amalgamation, reconstruction, and resolution under Section 45.
• N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee on UCBs (2021): Proposed a four-tier regulatory structure based on size and area of operation, with tier-specific capital, governance, and exposure norms.
• Tiered Regulation Circular (July 2022): Operationalised the four-tier structure.
• Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) Act, 1961 (Amended 2021): Raised deposit insurance to ₹5 lakh and enabled interim payment to depositors of stressed banks within 90 days.

Key Frameworks & Provisions Referenced

• Banking Regulation Act, 1949 — Primary statute regulating banking in India; Section 35A empowers RBI to issue directions; Sections 10A and 10B deal with board composition and chairperson appointment.
• Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 — Extended core RBI powers to cooperative banks.
• Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (Amended 2023) — Statute for multi-state cooperatives; the 2023 amendment strengthened governance, electoral processes, and dispute resolution.
• Cooperative Societies Acts (State-level) — For single-state UCBs.
• Article 43B (DPSP): Inserted by the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011; directs the State to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control, and professional management of cooperative societies.
• Part IXB of the Constitution (Articles 243ZH–243ZT): Inserted by the 97th Amendment, 2011; constitutional framework for cooperative societies.
• DICGC Act, 1961 (Amended 2021) — Deposit insurance up to ₹5 lakh.
• Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 — Statutory basis for RBI.
• N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee Report (2021) — Four-tier UCB structure.
• Ministry of Cooperation, 2021 — New Union ministry to provide institutional focus on cooperatives.

Key Aspects of the 2026 Amendment Directions

Provision	Requirement
Maximum continuous tenure	10 years
Cooling-off period	3 years (compulsory)
Reappointment	Only after the cooling-off period ends
Permitted association during cooling-off	Only as a member or customer of the UCB
Prohibited association during cooling-off	Any other capacity — including consultant, advisor, committee member
Statutory basis	Section 35A, Banking Regulation Act, 1949
Effective date	With immediate effect, 2026

Four-Tier UCB Structure (Per RBI Tiered Regulation Circular)

Tier	Coverage
Tier 1	All unit UCBs and salary earners’ UCBs (irrespective of deposit size); UCBs with deposits up to ₹100 crore
Tier 2	UCBs with deposits above ₹100 crore and up to ₹1,000 crore
Tier 3	UCBs with deposits above ₹1,000 crore and up to ₹10,000 crore
Tier 4	UCBs with deposits above ₹10,000 crore

Higher tiers face progressively stricter capital adequacy (CRAR), exposure, and governance norms — culminating in near-commercial-bank standards for Tier 4 UCBs.

India’s Position

India’s cooperative banking architecture is layered, with UCBs at the apex of the urban cooperative credit segment:

• Constitutional anchor: Article 43B (DPSP) and Part IXB (Articles 243ZH–243ZT) — inserted by the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011 — establish the cooperative society as a constitutionally recognized form of economic organisation.
• Statutory framework: Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020, Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (Amended 2023), State Cooperative Societies Acts, DICGC Act, 1961 (Amended 2021), RBI Act, 1934.
• Institutional architecture: RBI, NABARD (for rural cooperatives), DICGC, Ministry of Cooperation (2021), National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC, 1963), the upcoming NUCFDC (Umbrella Organisation for UCBs).
• Cooperative landscape: 8+ lakh cooperative societies across India; cooperative credit structure comprises PACS, DCCBs, SCBs (rural) and UCBs (urban).
• Reform milestones: PMC Bank crisis (2019) → Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 → DICGC (Amendment) Act, 2021 (₹5 lakh deposit insurance with 90-day interim payout) → Vishwanathan Committee (2021) → Tiered Regulation (2022) → Multi-State Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2023 → UCB Governance Amendment Directions, 2026.
• International alignment: Basel III prudential norms (in calibrated form for UCBs), International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) principles, G20 financial stability agenda.
• Vision 2047: Cooperative banks are positioned as last-mile institutions for financial inclusion under the Viksit Bharat @ 2047 roadmap — embedded into Digital Public Infrastructure (UPI, AA, ULI) and the PM Vishwakarma / MSME credit ecosystem.

Keywords & Definitions

▸ Urban Cooperative Bank (UCB): A cooperative credit institution operating primarily in urban and semi-urban areas, organised on cooperative principles and licensed under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (as applicable to cooperative societies).

▸ Cooperative Bank: A bank organised as a cooperative society, owned by its members, operating on the principle of one-member-one-vote, irrespective of capital contribution.

▸ Scheduled vs Non-Scheduled UCBs: Scheduled UCBs are included in the Second Schedule of the RBI Act, 1934 and meet RBI’s prescribed criteria (capital, deposits, regulatory compliance); non-scheduled UCBs are not.

▸ Single-State vs Multi-State UCBs: Single-state UCBs are registered under a State Cooperative Societies Act; multi-state UCBs are registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

▸ Banking Regulation Act, 1949: Primary statute regulating banking in India; Section 35A empowers RBI to issue directions; Section 45 governs amalgamation; Sections 10A & 10B prescribe board composition.

▸ Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020: Extended RBI’s core supervisory powers (board supersession, administrator appointment, CEO fit-and-proper, amalgamation, capital regulation) to cooperative banks.

▸ Section 35A, BR Act: Empowers the RBI to issue directions in the public interest, in the interest of banking policy, or to prevent the affairs of a bank from being conducted in a manner detrimental to depositors.

▸ Fit-and-Proper Criteria: RBI’s eligibility framework for directors and CEOs of banks — based on integrity, expertise, financial soundness, and absence of conflict of interest.

▸ Cooling-off Period: A statutorily mandated gap during which a person previously associated with an institution cannot rejoin or be otherwise engaged.

▸ N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee (2021): RBI-appointed committee that recommended a four-tier regulatory framework for UCBs with progressively stricter prudential and governance norms.

▸ DICGC Act, 1961 (Amended 2021): Provides deposit insurance up to ₹5 lakh per depositor per bank; the 2021 amendment introduced interim payment to depositors of stressed banks within 90 days.

▸ 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011: Inserted Article 43B (DPSP) and Part IXB (Articles 243ZH–243ZT) on cooperative societies; part of Part IXB applicable to multi-state cooperatives was upheld by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah (2021).

▸ Article 43B: Directs the State to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control, and professional management of cooperative societies.

▸ Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (Amended 2023): Governs cooperatives operating across more than one state; the 2023 amendment strengthened governance, elections, and dispute resolution.

▸ Ministry of Cooperation: Created in July 2021 to provide a separate administrative and policy framework for the cooperative sector; currently headed by the Union Home and Cooperation Minister.

▸ NUCFDC (National Urban Cooperative Finance and Development Corporation): Approved as the Umbrella Organisation for the UCB sector — to provide liquidity, capital, technology, and shared services.

▸ PMC Bank Crisis (2019): Collapse of the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative Bank due to over-concentration of loans to HDIL; trigger for the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020.

▸ CRAR (Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio): Prudential capital adequacy norm, calibrated for each tier of UCBs.

▸ Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Framework: RBI’s structured intervention regime for banks breaching thresholds on capital, asset quality, or leverage.

▸ PACS, DCCBs, SCBs: Three-tier rural cooperative credit structure — Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (village level), District Central Cooperative Banks (district level), State Cooperative Banks (state level) — regulated by RBI and supervised by NABARD.

Question Section (MCQs)

Q1. The “Reserve Bank of India (Urban Co-operative Banks, Governance) Amendment Directions, 2026” have been issued by the RBI primarily under:

(a) Section 21 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (b) Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (c) Section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (d) Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Q2. Consider the following provisions of the 2026 RBI Directions on UCB directors:

1. The maximum continuous tenure of a director on a UCB board is 10 years.
2. The mandatory cooling-off period is 3 years.
3. During the cooling-off period, the individual may continue as a consultant or advisor to the UCB.
4. During the cooling-off period, the individual is permitted to remain associated only as a member or customer of the UCB.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q3. The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020 empowered the RBI to:

1. Supersede the board of a cooperative bank in the public interest.
2. Appoint administrators to cooperative banks.
3. Approve appointment of CEOs of cooperative banks under fit-and-proper criteria.
4. Issue currency notes of any denomination.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q4. The N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee, 2021, in the context of Urban Cooperative Banks, primarily recommended:

(a) The merger of all UCBs into State Bank of India (b) A four-tier regulatory structure for UCBs based on size and area of operation (c) Complete delicensing of UCBs (d) Conversion of all UCBs into Small Finance Banks within five years

Q5. Consider the following statements regarding Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) in India:

1. UCBs are regulated solely by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, with no role for the RBI.
2. Multi-State UCBs are registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.
3. Deposit insurance for UCBs is provided by the DICGC up to ₹5 lakh per depositor per bank.
4. The umbrella organisation for the UCB sector approved by RBI is the NUCFDC.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q6. The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011:

(a) Inserted Article 43B as a Directive Principle of State Policy on cooperative societies (b) Inserted Part IXB on Cooperative Societies into the Constitution (c) Made it a Fundamental Right of citizens to form cooperative societies under Article 19(1)(c) (d) All of the above

Q7. The Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC):

1. Is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of India.
2. Was established under the DICGC Act, 1961.
3. Currently provides deposit insurance up to ₹5 lakh per depositor per bank.
4. Under the 2021 amendment, depositors of a stressed bank can receive an interim payment within 90 days.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Q8. Under the Tiered Regulation framework for UCBs (operationalised by RBI in 2022), Tier 4 consists of UCBs with deposits:

(a) Above ₹100 crore but up to ₹1,000 crore (b) Above ₹1,000 crore but up to ₹10,000 crore (c) Above ₹10,000 crore (d) Above ₹50,000 crore

Q9. The Ministry of Cooperation, which now administers many aspects of cooperative sector policy in India, was created in:

(a) 2014 (b) 2016 (c) 2019 (d) 2021

Q10. Match the following cooperative banking institutions with their primary role:

Institution	Role
A. PACS	1. State-level apex rural cooperative bank
B. DCCBs	2. Village-level primary agricultural credit society
C. SCBs	3. District-level central cooperative bank
D. NABARD	4. Refinance and supervision of rural cooperatives

Select the correct answer:

(a) A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4 (b) A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4 (c) A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4 (d) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4

Answer Key with Explanations

▸ Q1 → (b) Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Section 35A empowers the RBI to issue directions in the public interest, in the interest of banking policy, or to prevent the affairs of a bank from being conducted in a manner detrimental to depositors. Section 45 deals with amalgamation and reconstruction; Sections 21 and 22 relate to credit and licensing respectively.

▸ Q2 → (b) 1, 2 and 4 only. Statement 3 is wrong — during the cooling-off period, the individual is explicitly prohibited from acting as a consultant, advisor, or committee member of the UCB. Permitted association is limited strictly to being a member or customer. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct.

▸ Q3 → (a) 1, 2 and 3 only. Statement 4 is wrong — issuance of currency notes is governed by the RBI Act, 1934, not by the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020. The Amendment Act extended RBI’s supervisory powers (board supersession, administrator appointment, CEO fit-and-proper) to cooperative banks.

▸ Q4 → (b) A four-tier regulatory structure for UCBs based on size and area of operation. The N. S. Vishwanathan Expert Committee on UCBs (2021) recommended a four-tier regulatory structure, subsequently operationalised by RBI in July 2022, with progressively stricter prudential and governance norms.

▸ Q5 → (b) 2, 3 and 4 only. Statement 1 is wrong — UCBs are under dual regulation: the RBI regulates banking functions, while the Registrar of Cooperative Societies handles managerial/registration aspects. Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct.

▸ Q6 → (d) All of the above. The 97th Amendment inserted Article 43B (DPSP), Part IXB (Articles 243ZH–243ZT), and added “cooperative societies” to Article 19(1)(c) as a fundamental right to form associations. (Note: Part IXB’s application to state cooperatives was struck down in Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah (2021) on federalism grounds; it survives for multi-state cooperatives.)

▸ Q7 → (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. All four statements are correct. DICGC is a wholly-owned RBI subsidiary, established under the DICGC Act, 1961, with insurance cover raised to ₹5 lakh in 2020 and the 90-day interim payment mechanism introduced via the 2021 amendment.

▸ Q8 → (c) Above ₹10,000 crore. Under the Tiered Regulation framework, Tier 4 UCBs are those with deposits above ₹10,000 crore, facing the strictest, near-commercial-bank prudential and governance norms.

▸ Q9 → (d) 2021. The Ministry of Cooperation was carved out from the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare in July 2021 to provide a separate administrative and policy framework for the cooperative sector.

▸ Q10 → (a) A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4. PACS → village-level Primary Agricultural Credit Society; DCCB → District Central Cooperative Bank; SCB → State Cooperative Bank (apex rural cooperative); NABARD → refinance and supervision of rural cooperatives.